In the ever-evolving landscape of health systems, citizen advocacy stands as a tool for
influencing policy aiming to strengthen health systems. This dissertation delves into the
multifaceted nature of health policy advocacy and how citizen advocates can leverage research
evidence in addition to the commonly used emotional messaging to influence policy.
The first study is a critical interpretive synthesis (CIS), creating a theoretical framework that
helps us understand the roles of citizen health policy advocates and their relation to research
evidence. The second study is a multiple-case study that examines the approaches taken by
citizen-serving NGOs in their advocacy training and whether and how research evidence is
incorporated into the training. The third study is a qualitative descriptive study that explores
citizens' experiences participating in these training modules and their perceptions of factors
affecting the incorporation of research evidence in the training.
In Chapter 2, we included 32 publications in the CIS, and four thematic groups were identified,
including the roles of citizen health policy advocates, how research evidence could support
them and the facilitators and barriers to their use of research evidence. In Chapter 3, we
conducted a documentary review of 27 documents and interviewed 16 staff and board members
of three organizations that provide advocacy training to citizen advocates. In Chapter 3, we
interviewed 14 citizens who participated in the training of the three organizations.
v
The first study outlined how citizens could use research evidence and its importance to their
advocacy roles, while the last two studies provide an understanding of how citizen-serving
organizations offer training to citizen advocates and whether, how, and under what conditions
they include research evidence in training. / Thesis / Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) / Advocacy is an effective way to influence policies in democratic societies. One of those areas
that are influenced by policy advocacy is health systems. Citizens who advocate for improving
their health systems often rely on personal emotional messages rather than peer-reviewed
research evidence. This dissertation tries to understand why this is the case and how research
evidence can support those citizens. We also explore the factors that encourage or hinder
citizens from using research evidence in health policy advocacy. We then examine three
citizen-serving organizations that support citizens with advocacy training and explore how they
support the trainees to use research evidence in advocacy. We also examine the experiences of
citizens who participated in those training sessions and how they perceive the utility of research
evidence in their advocacy to strengthen their health systems.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:mcmaster.ca/oai:macsphere.mcmaster.ca:11375/29694 |
| Date | January 2024 |
| Creators | Belal, Ahmed Atef |
| Contributors | Lavis, John N., Health Policy |
| Source Sets | McMaster University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0029 seconds