Return to search

An assessment of personnel accountability within manufacturing at Continental Tyre South Africa

South Africa as a country producing certain commodities is experiencing profound changes as a result of globalisation. Globalisation refers to the sourcing of goods from locations around the world to take advantage of national differences in the cost and quality of factors of production, such as labour, energy, land and capital. By doing this, companies hope to lower their overall cost structure and improve the quality or functionality of their product offering, thereby allowing them to compete more effectively. To remain competitive in a global environment, having personnel who are accountable for what they have control over, can help revitalise the business character, strengthen the global competitiveness of corporations, heighten innovation, improve the quality of products and services produced by companies’ world wide, and increase the responsiveness of organisations to the needs and wants of customers. Continental Tyre South Africa (CTSA) is a local and global supplier of tyres, and the global sourcing for tyres by sales divisions, requires CTSA to remain competitive on price in the global market. The overall purpose of the research was to assess the current level of personnel accountability on all levels within manufacturing at CTSA and to formulate recommendations to address the shortfalls identified through the research. The research methodology for this study comprised of the following steps: Firstly, the contextual elements that define accountability were researched; Secondly, the appropriate research methodology techniques were researched and applied. The current level of accountability was assessed in an empirical study which involved completing a questionnaire during structured interviews with respondents; and Thirdly, the data obtained from the questionnaires were analysed showing some areas of accountability, but shortfalls in other areas. The final step of this study entailed the formulation of recommendations to address the shortfalls identified in the different levels and elements of accountability namely: Responsibility, Ability, Means, Authority and Measurement.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:nmmu/vital:8569
Date January 2007
CreatorsLiebenberg, Johann
PublisherNelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Faculty of Business and Economic Sciences
Source SetsSouth African National ETD Portal
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis, Masters, MBA
Formatxii, 127 leaves ; 30 cm, pdf
RightsNelson Mandela Metropolitan University

Page generated in 0.0022 seconds