Guardrails were designed to deter vehicle access to off-road areas and consequently prevent hitting rigid fixed object alongside the road (e.g., trees, utility poles, traffic barriers, etc.). However, guardrails cause 10% of deaths of vehicle-to-fixed object crashes which has attracted attention in the highway safety community on the vehicle-based injury criteria used in guardrail regulations. The objectives of this study were 1) to develop and validate a Finite Element (FE) model of the ET-Plus, a commonly used energy-absorbing guardrail end terminal; 2) to examine the conditions of in-service end terminals, and to evaluate the performance of the damaged relative to undamaged end terminals in simulated impacts; 3) to investigate both full-body and body region driver injury probabilities during car-to-end terminal crashes using dummy and human body FE models; to analyze the relationship between the vehicle-based crash severity metrics used currently in regulations and the injury probabilities assessed using biomechanics injury criteria; and 4) to quantify the influence of pre-impact conditions on injury probabilities.
In this dissertation, an ET-Plus FE model was developed based on publicly available data on ET-Plus dimensions and material properties. The model was validated against the NCHRP-350 crash tests. The developed ET-Plus model was used to develop to five damaged ET-Plus whose damage patterns were identified based on an investigation of in-service end terminals mounted along U.S. roads. It was observed that damaged end terminals usually increase collision severity compared to undamaged end terminals. Meanwhile, a total of 40 FE impact simulations between a car with a dummy/human body model in the driver seat and an end terminal model were performed in various configurations. The vehicle-based severity metrics were observed to be correlated to full-body and certain body-region injury risks while no head injury risk could be predicted. The results pointed out that more advanced vehicle-based metrics should be proposed and investigated to improve the predictability in terms of occupant injury risks in the crash tests. The simulation models could also supplement crash compliance tests of new hardware designs, by investigating their safety performance for a large variety of pre-impact conditions, observed in traffic accidents, but not included the compliance tests. / Doctor of Philosophy / Guardrails were designed to deter vehicle access to off-road areas and consequently prevent hitting rigid fixed object alongside the road (e.g., trees, utility poles, traffic barriers, etc.). However, guardrails cause 10% of deaths of vehicle-to-fixed object crashes which has attracted attention in the highway safety community on the vehicle-based injury criteria used in guardrail regulations. The objectives of this study were 1) to develop and validate a Finite Element (FE) model of the ET-Plus, a commonly used energy-absorbing guardrail end terminal; 2) to examine the conditions of in-service end terminals, and to evaluate the performance of the damaged relative to undamaged end terminals in simulated impacts; 3) to investigate both full-body and body region driver injury probabilities during car-to-end terminal crashes using dummy and human body FE models; to analyze the relationship between the vehicle-based crash severity metrics used currently in regulations and the injury probabilities assessed using biomechanics injury criteria; and 4) to quantify the influence of pre-impact conditions on injury probabilities.
In this dissertation, an ET-Plus FE model was developed based on publicly available data on ET-Plus dimensions and material properties. The model was validated against the NCHRP-350 crash tests. The developed ET-Plus model was used to develop to five damaged ET-Plus whose damage patterns were identified based on an investigation of in-service end terminals mounted along U.S. roads. It was observed that damaged end terminals usually increase collision severity compared to undamaged end terminals. Meanwhile, a total of 40 FE impact simulations between a car with a dummy/human body model in the driver seat and an end terminal model were performed in various configurations. The vehicle-based severity metrics were observed to be correlated to full-body and certain body-region injury risks while no head injury risk could be predicted. The results pointed out that more advanced vehicle-based metrics should be proposed and investigated to improve the predictability in terms of occupant injury risks in the crash tests. The simulation models could also supplement crash compliance tests of new hardware designs, by investigating their safety performance for a large variety of pre-impact conditions, observed in traffic accidents, but not included the compliance tests.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:VTETD/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/111610 |
| Date | 23 August 2022 |
| Creators | Meng, Yunzhu |
| Contributors | Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Untaroiu, Costin D., Lee, Yong Woo, Hardy, Warren Nelson, Doerzaph, Zachary R., Duma, Stefan M. |
| Publisher | Virginia Tech |
| Source Sets | Virginia Tech Theses and Dissertation |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Dissertation |
| Format | ETD, application/pdf |
| Rights | In Copyright, http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds