The Full-Displacement Pressuremeter (FDPM) Test is one in which a pressuremeter is installed in the soil by pushing it behind a conical tip. Earlier work had indicated that the unload-reload modulus measured with the FDPM was very similar to that obtained from self-boring pressuremeter (SBPM) testing. It had also been suggested that if the pressuremeter was capable of sufficient expansion, the interpreted soil properties would be those of the soil beyond the zone of disturbance. This study examined the factors affecting the measurement, analysis and interpretation of soil properties from FDPM pressure-expansion curves in sands with emphasis on the unload-reload modulus.
The effects of equipment design and dimensions, installation method and of test procedure on the analysis and interpretation of lateral stress, shear strength and stiffness were studied during laboratory and field evaluation of two prototype FDPMs. The overwhelming importance of instrument dimensions and tolerances on the test results was clearly shown. Movements of a fraction of a millimetre can have a large effect on the measured lateral stress and stiffness. Test procedures were also shown to have a large effect on the data obtained. It was demonstrated that rate effects became important in pressuremeter tests involving expansion to large strains and a stress-strain strain rate concept was proposed to aid in the understanding of these effects.
Theories developed for the interpretation of shear strength of sands from SBPM tests were shown to be inapplicable to the interpretation of FDPM test results. The unload-reload modulus was shown to be an indicator of soil stiffness but the effects of stress level and degree of unloading have to be considered when attempting to derive a stiffness for design. A rational approach to the interpretation of modulus was presented and it was shown that unload-reload moduli from both SBPM and FDPM could be interpreted using the same approach. The need for standardising the equipment design, testing procedures and methods of analysis and interpretation was shown. / Applied Science, Faculty of / Civil Engineering, Department of / Graduate
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UBC/oai:circle.library.ubc.ca:2429/30931 |
| Date | January 1991 |
| Creators | Howie, John Alan |
| Publisher | University of British Columbia |
| Source Sets | University of British Columbia |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Text, Thesis/Dissertation |
| Rights | For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds