Return to search

Terrorism, Provocation, and Mobilization

The main aim of this dissertation is to study the underlying competition between governments and terrorist organizations for support of the population. The government and the terrorist organization are locked in a struggle to win the hearts and minds of potential followers, and their weapons are to strike at each other or attempt to buy the support of the population. This dissertation investigates this battle and attempts to answer why governments so often respond with harsh, disproportional responses when these responses appear to strengthen the terrorist organization. While the terrorist organization may have an incentive to risk triggering a crushing and debilitating response from the government if this response increases their base mobilization rate, the question remains as to why the government responds with such an attack. This dissertation is structured in five chapters: (1) Introduction, summarizing the key insights from the 3 main papers; (2) Paper 01, investigating the role of uncertainty regarding the terrorist's resource level and the impact this uncertainty plays on the decision to respond with a discriminating or undiscriminating counterstrike; (3) Paper 02, addressing the role social services plays in strengthening the popular support of the terrorist organization; (4) Paper 03, adding more nuance to the previous arguments by allowing for the support of the terrorist organization to be heterogenous (consisting of both core and popular support) and endogenizing this support as a response to the actions of the terrorist organization and the government; (5) Conclusion, discussing the limitations of the project and a discussion of future research. / A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. / Summer Semester, 2013. / June 26, 2013. / club goods, counterterrorism, insurgency, provocation, social goods provision,
terrorism / Includes bibliographical references. / David A. Siegel, Professor Co-Directing Dissertation; Will H. Moore, Professor Co-Directing Dissertation; David J. Cooper, University Representative; Mark Souva, Committee Member; Jens Großer, Committee Member.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:fsu.edu/oai:fsu.digital.flvc.org:fsu_183825
ContributorsMele, Christine (authoraut), Siegel, David A. (professor co-directing dissertation), Moore, Will H. (professor co-directing dissertation), Cooper, David J. (university representative), Souva, Mark (committee member), Großer, Jens (committee member), Department of Political Science (degree granting department), Florida State University (degree granting institution)
PublisherFlorida State University, Florida State University
Source SetsFlorida State University
LanguageEnglish, English
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeText, text
Format1 online resource, computer, application/pdf
RightsThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). The copyright in theses and dissertations completed at Florida State University is held by the students who author them.

Page generated in 0.0013 seconds