The nature of existence, which science seeks to investigate, is dynamic as novel discoveries are constantly presented. To explain such a dynamic existence, science itself needs to be dynamic. Methodological differentiation is one way in which science expresses dynamism. Such differentiation led to the theological and the natural sciences, and conflicting views regarding the nature of existence: the theological worldview versus the natural worldview. This study is a comparison of the conflicting worldviews of the theological and cosmological (natural worldview) theories of the beginning of existence. The study compares them in an attempt to redress the conflict and encourage dialogue between the two methods for a better representation of existence.
The study exposes the limits of the theological and the natural worldviews. It proposes a relationship of dialogue between them so that they transcend their individual limits and are able to grow. Dialogue involves the interchange of ideas to broaden perspectives, which leads to growth. A relationship of dialogue emphasises similarities in presuppositions, methodology and content, and exploits these to attain a greater degree of certitude. Theology and natural science can be viewed analogically as two sides of the same coin, two aspects to one reality, that can collaborate, albeit independently, to reveal a broader view of reality. They can converse through dialogue, exchange ideas and share views, even though they remain methodologically exclusive, independent worldviews.
Finally, dialogue involves a transformation of reason in that it expects theologians and natural scientists to change the way they view reality. If we were to transform our reasoning into something more complete, our worldview should represent a more complete representation of existence. This means that the theologian and the scientist can, occasionally, go beyond their scope and method and push their knowledge towards progress through dialogue. This makes “transformed reason” the method of dialogue, which redresses the conflict between theology and natural science and encourages interchange between them. / Inhlobo yobukhona, isayense edinga ukuphenyisisa ngakho, kuyashintshashintsha njengokutholwayo okusha okuhlala njalo kwethulwa. Ukuchaza lokhu kushintshashintsha okukhona, isayense ngokwayo idinga ukushintshashintsha ngokuhambisana nesimo. Umehluko wezindlela zokwenza ngenye yendlela lapho isayense ekhombisa khona ukushintshashintsha ngokuhambisana nesimo. Lo mehluko uholele abaholi bezenkolo kanye nabesayense yemvelo, kanye nemibono engqubuzanayo maqondana nenhlobo yobukhona; umbono ngezenkolo uma kuqhathaniswa nombono ngezemvelo. Lolu cwaningo luqhathanisa umbono ongqubuzanayo ngomhlaba ngenkolo kanye nekhosmoloji (indlela yokubuka izinto yemvelo), amathiyori okuqala kobukhona. Ucwaningo luqhathanisa lezi zinto ngemizamo yokubhekana nokungqubuzana kanye nokukhuthaza idayalogu phakathi kwezindlela ezimbili ukuze kube nokumeleka kahle kobukhona.
Lolu cwaningo luveza izihibe ezikhona kwindlela yokubuka izinto yezenkolo kanye nezemvelo. Luphakamisa ubudlelwane bedayalogu phakathi kwazo, ukuze kweqiwe imingcele yazo zombili ngayinye kanye nokukhula. Idayalogu ibandakanya ukushintshana ngemibono ukunabisa indlela yokubuka izinto, okuholela ekukhuleni. Ubudlelwane bedayalogu bugcizelela ukufana kwezilinganiso (presuppositions), izindlela zokwenza kanye nengqikithi, kanye nokucwaninga lezi zinto ukufinyelela ezingeni elikhulu lokuqiniseka ngendlela izinto eziyikho. Imfundo ngenkolo kanye nesayense yemvelo kungabonwa njengokulandelanayo kwezinhlangothi ezimbili kwikhoyini eyodwa, izinto ezimbili kwimvelo eyodwa, kungahambisana,ngisho noma okunye kuzimele ngokwehlukile kokunye, kuveza umbono obanzi walokho isimo esiyikho.
Kungakhulumisana ngedayalogu, ukushintshana ngemibono kanye nokwabelana ngemibono, ngisho noma izindlela zakho zokwenza zehlukile, imibono ngomhlaba kwehlujkile nokuzimela.
Okokugcina, idayalogu ibandakanya ushintsho lwembangela ngoba kulindele ukuthi abezenkolo kanye nososayense bashintshe izindlela ababona ngaso lokho isimo esiyikho. Uma bekufanele siguqule indlela esibona ngayo iziimbangela ukuya kwinto ethile ephelele, indlela esibona ngayo umhlaba nayo kumele imele umfanekiso ophelele kakhulu ngobukhona. Lokhu kusho ukuthi abaholi bezenkolo kanye nososayense, bangathi ngezinye izikhathi, babuke ngaphezulu kwendlela abobona ngayo kanye nezindlela zokwenza, kanye nokududula ulwazi lwabo ukuthi luthuthuke ngedayalogu. Lokhu kwenza "imbangela eguqukile" ibe yindlela yokwenza idayalogu, okubhekana nokungqubuzana phakathi kwezenkolo kanye nesayense yemvelo kanye nokukhuthaza ukuxhumana phakathi kwazo. / Sebopeho sa boteng, seo mahlale a batlang ho se batlisisa, se ba matla ha ditshibollo tse ntjha di nehelanwa kgafetsa. Ho hlalosa boteng bo matla jwalo, mahlale ka boona a hloka ho ba matla. Phapang ya mekgwa ke tsela e nngwe eo mahlale a hlalosang matla ka yona. Phapang e jwalo e lebisitse ho thuto ya bodumedi le mahlale a tlhaho, le maikutlo a hanyetsanang mabapi le sebopeho sa boteng: dipono tsa lefatshe tsa thuto ya bodumedi kgahlanong le pono e akaretsang ya tlhaho. Phuputso ena ke papiso ya maikutlo a akaretsang a lwantshanang a dikgopolo tsa thuto ya bodumedi le dikgopolo tsa tshimoloho le ntlafatso ya bokahohle (pono e akaretsang ya tlhaho) tsa qaleho ya boteng. Phuputso ena e di bapisa ho leka ho lokisa kgohlano le ho kgothaletsa puisano dipakeng tsa mekgwa e mmedi bakeng sa boemedi bo betere ba boteng.
Phuputso ena e pepesa ditekanyetso tsa maikutlo a akaretsang a thuto ya bodumedi le tlhaho. E kgothaletsa kamano ya puisano dipakeng tsa tsona e le hore di fete ditekanyetso tsa tsona ka bomong mme di tsebe ho hola. Puisano e kenyeletsa phapanyetsano ya mehopolo ho hodisa maikutlo, e leng se lebisang ho kgolo. Kamano ya puisano e totobatsa ho tshwana dikgakanyong, mokgweng le ho dikateng, mme e sebedisa tsena ho fihlella tekanyetso e kgolo ya ho nepahala. Thuto ya bodumedi le mahlale a tlhaho di ka tadingwa ka mokgwa o tshwanang e le mahlakore a mabedi a tjhelete e le nngwe ya tshepe, dikarolo tse pedi ho nnete e le nngwe, tse ka sebedisanang, leha di ikemetse, ho senola pono e pharalletseng ya nnete. Di ka sebedisana ka dipuisano, tsa fapanyetsana maikutlo le ho arolelana dipono, leha e le hore di dula e le dipono tse akaretsang tse ikemetseng, tse ikgethang mokgweng.
Qetellong, puisano e kenyeletsa phetoho ya mabaka ka hore e lebelletse ditsebi tsa thuto ya bodumedi le boramahlale ba tlhaho ho fetola tsela eo ba tadimang nnete ka yona. Haeba re ne re ka fetola monahano wa rona hore e be ntho e nngwe e felletseng, pono ya rona e akaretsang e lokela ho emela setshwantsho se felletseng sa boteng. Sena se bolela hore setsebi sa thuto ya bodumedi le ramahlale, ka dinako tse ding, ba ka feta maemo le mokgwa wa bona mme ba sutumeletsa tsebo ya bona tswelopeleng ka puisano. Sena se etsa "lebaka le fetotsweng" mokgwa wa puisano, o rarollang kgohlano dipakeng tsa thuto ya bodumedi le mahlale a tlhaho le ho kgothaletsa phapanyetsano dipakeng tsa tsona. / Philosophy, Practical and Systematic Theology / M.A. (Philosophy)
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:unisa/oai:uir.unisa.ac.za:10500/27240 |
| Date | January 2021 |
| Creators | Fynn, Lionel |
| Contributors | Scott, Callum David |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Dissertation |
| Format | 1 online resource (109 leaves), application/pdf |
Page generated in 0.0042 seconds