As workplace demands change, a need has developed for alternatives to traditional
education. With advancements in electronic telecommunication technologies, distance
education has become a viable alternative to traditional classrooms for working
professionals. Efficiency and cost effectiveness are driving many programs to place oncampus
students and distance students in the same courses at the same time. This
phenomenon has resulted in the placement of students with vastly different backgrounds,
levels of expertise, and levels of motivation in the same classrooms. Often a professor
will teach to one learning style, leaving some students in the dust, never to get on track.
Without face-to-face contact with an instructor, this can leave distance education students
feeling isolated and alone.
There is a continuing need for the development of alternative instruments to
assess self-directed learning (Brockett & Himestra, 1991). We must develop a means of
determining an individual??s readiness for self-directed learning, as well as a device for
measuring the efficiency of programs designed to foster the attitudes and skills which are
involved in increased self-directedness in learning (Guglielmino, 1977). Self-directed
learning readiness is important to a learner??s success in distance education programs. Inorder for an educator to tailor instruction to the unique attributes of each student, there is
a need for an instrument that will identify the learner??s stage of self-directedness or
degree of dependency and for an instrument that will determine the educator??s default
teaching style at the beginning of a course. Such an instrument will help instructors
increase their learners?? level of self-direction and will improve the overall quality, student
satisfaction, and student retention in distance learning courses.
The purpose of this study is to develop and pilot test two instruments based upon
the Staged Self Directed Learning Model (Grow, 1991) and the key assumptions of
andragogy: one measuring the self-directed learning readiness of a student in the context
of an individual course and the other measuring the teaching style of the instructor in the
context of the same course. The data will be analyzed and given to the instructor to give
him/her an idea of the self-directed learning readiness level of students enrolled in the
course. A report will be generated to show matches and mismatches between the
instructor??s teaching style and the self-directed learning readiness level of the students. A
decision model will be developed to suggest teaching strategies that minimize
mismatches and facilitate the growth of students from dependent to self-directed through
the course.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:tamu.edu/oai:repository.tamu.edu:1969.1/2685 |
| Date | 01 November 2005 |
| Creators | Richards, Lance Jonathan |
| Contributors | Dooley, Kim E., Lindner, James R. |
| Publisher | Texas A&M University |
| Source Sets | Texas A and M University |
| Language | en_US |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Book, Thesis, Electronic Thesis, text |
| Format | 4981145 bytes, electronic, application/pdf, born digital |
Page generated in 0.0019 seconds