The strength model of self-control suggests that self-regulation and self-control processes are governed by finite internal energy resources. However, this perspective has recently come under scrutiny suggesting that self-control processes are not solely constrained to limited resources and may also be guided by motivational-cognitive processing. Self-efficacy theory and control theory are two theoretical views of self-regulation that also suggest self-regulation failures are dependent on motivational-cognitive processes; however the potential role of limited resources has not been evaluated in the context of these theoretical views. This dissertation sought to advance our understanding of self-regulation and self-control of exercise behaviour by integrating the three theoretical perspectives discussed above.
Study 1 showed that self-control depletion leads to reductions in task self-efficacy mediating the self-control depletion – negative performance change relationship. Overall, findings are consistent with self-efficacy theory. However the results are limited as the mechanism(s) leading to reduced self-efficacy following self-control depletion remain unclear.
Study 2 explored a sequential (serial) mediation model investigating the idea that exerting self-control leads to an altered psychophysiological state increasing subjective fatigue, which in turn, leads to reduced self-efficacy to exert self-control and reductions in physical self-control performance. Findings supported the proposed sequential mediation model. However, it remains unclear to what extent that self-efficacy plays a passive or active role guiding self-controlled behaviour following self-control depletion.
Study 3 explored the independent and interactive effects of self-control depletion and normative performance feedback on self-efficacy and physical self-control. Findings showed an interaction between self-control depletion and feedback. Findings support predictions of control theory when self-control resources are intact, but suggest feedback information is processed differently when self-control strength is depleted. Overall, results show that when self-efficacy is manipulated by feedback the effects of self-control depletion on performance are no longer evident supporting self-efficacy’s role as an active causal mechanism determining behaviour. / Dissertation / Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) / Self-control failures are at the heart of many societal problems. A dominant theoretical view suggests self-control is governed by a limited internal resource. However, this perspective has recently been opposed by theorizing and evidence suggesting that people experience self-control failures due to shifts in motivational-cognitive processes. This thesis integrated three theories of self-control (i.e., strength model of self-control, control theory, and self-efficacy theory) in an attempt to provide a more complete understanding of why self-control failures occur for people performing demanding physical exercise. Findings suggest that each theoretical perspective provides complementary explanations for why self-control failures occur and how they can be overcome through shifts in cognitive processing. Specifically, self-control exertion leads to subjective fatigue, which decreases self-efficacy to exert self-control, and in turn reduces self-control performance. Furthermore, after self-control exertion, positive normative performance feedback increases self-efficacy and subsequent self-control performance whereas negative feedback drastically reduces self-efficacy and performance.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:mcmaster.ca/oai:macsphere.mcmaster.ca:11375/18355 |
| Date | January 2015 |
| Creators | Graham, Jeffrey |
| Contributors | Bray, Steven, Kinesiology |
| Source Sets | McMaster University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds