The aim of this thesis is to write a multisensor navigation algorithm and to design a test setup. After doing these, test the algorithm by using the test setup. In navigation, dead reckoning is a procedure to calculate the position from initial position with some measured inputs. These measurements do not include absolute position data. Using only an inertial measurement unit is an example for dead reckoning navigation. Calculating position and velocity with the inertial measurement unit is highly erroneous because, this calculation requires integration of acceleration data. Integration means accumulation of errors as time goes. For example, a constant acceleration error of 0.1 m/s^2 on 1 m/s^2 of acceleration will lead to 10% of position error in only 5 seconds. In addition to this, wrong calculation of attitude is going to blow the accumulated position errors. However, solving the navigation equations while knowing the initial position and the IMU readings is possible, the IMU is not used solely in practice. In literature, there are studies about this topic and in these studies / some other sensors aid the navigation calculations. The aiding or fusion of sensors is accomplished via Kalman filter.
In this thesis, a navigation algorithm and a sensor fusion algorithm were written. The sensor fusion algorithm is based on estimation of IMU errors by use of a Kalman filter. The design of Kalman filter is possible after deriving the mathematical model of error propagation of mechanization equations.
For the sensor fusion, an IMU, two incremental encoders and a digital compass were utilized. The digital compass outputs the orientation data directly (without integration). In order to find the position, encoder data is calculated in dead reckoning sense. The sensor triplet aids the IMU which calculates position data by integrations. In order to mount these four sensors, an unmanned tracked vehicle prototype was manufactured. For data acquisition, an xPC&ndash / Target system was set.
After planning the test procedure, the tests were performed. In the tests, different paths for different sensor fusion algorithms were experimented. The results were recorded in a computer and a number of figures were plotted in order to analyze the results. The results illustrate the benefit of sensor fusion and how much feedback sensor fusion is better than feed forward sensor fusion.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:METU/oai:etd.lib.metu.edu.tr:http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12614939/index.pdf |
| Date | 01 October 2012 |
| Creators | Kirimlioglu, Serdar |
| Contributors | Konukseven, Erhan Ilhan |
| Publisher | METU |
| Source Sets | Middle East Technical Univ. |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | M.S. Thesis |
| Format | text/pdf |
| Rights | To liberate the content for METU campus |
Page generated in 0.0078 seconds