Yes / This briefing paper compares two approaches to community-based planning in Tanzania, South Africa and Uganda. Analysing these interventions through an audit of sustainable livelihood `principles¿ (as a proxy for best practice) reveals general lessons about both the practical opportunities and challenges for employing sustainable livelihoods approaches to the design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of development interventions and also about the changing format of development interventions. / Department for International Development
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:BRADFORD/oai:bradscholars.brad.ac.uk:10454/2960 |
Date | 03 1900 |
Creators | Toner, Anna L., Franks, Tom R., Goldman, I., Howlett, David, Kamuzora, Faustin, Muhumuza, F., Tamasane, T. |
Publisher | Bradford Centre for International Development. |
Source Sets | Bradford Scholars |
Language | English |
Detected Language | English |
Type | Briefing Paper, published version paper |
Rights | © 2004 The Authors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share-Alike License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/uk). |
Relation | http://www.bradford.ac.uk/acad/dppc/research/poverty/projects/goodbye/papers/GtP_Briefing_Paper_4.pdf |
Page generated in 0.0016 seconds