This thesis is focused on ways of defining the requirements for performance testing software, both in practice (based on survey) as well as in theory. The aim of this thesis is to analyze ways of defining performance requirements, which are actually used on IT projects. In order to achieve this goal it is necessary to define concepts of performance testing, implement and evaluate the survey of the using ways of defining performance requirements in practice and then analyze ways of defining performance requirements in terms of their applicability to different types of IT projects. The contribution of this thesis is the comprehensive introduction performance testing software issues and mainly insight into ways of defining performance requirements used in practice and problems associated with them, through the survey, which was implemented and evaluated by myself. The conclusions resulting from this survey summarize which ways of defining performance requirements are applied to specific types of IT projects, which of these ways worked and which problems in certain cases that occur in practice. The thesis is divided into theoretical and practical part. The theoretical part explains the basic concepts associated with performance testing software. In this part, there is also described the methodology of defining performance requirements according to Tom Gilb. The practical part is focused on the realization and evaluation of survey of the using ways of defining performance requirements in practice and on the analysis ways of defining performance requirements with respect to certain types of projects.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:193128 |
| Date | January 2015 |
| Creators | Vodrážka, Michal |
| Contributors | Buchalcevová, Alena, Strharský, Jaroslav |
| Publisher | Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze |
| Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
| Language | Czech |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds