This thesis analyses the question of the regulation, motivated by egalitarian
concerns, of homophobic hate speech and homosexual pornography. I attempt to
. critically evaluate what both liberal humanism and postmodernism can tell us about these
types of speech, and how we should best treat them, in a framework that takes lesbians'
and gays' equality as the underlying organising principle.
Although homosexual pornography cannot be convincingly exempted from
regulation by affirming that it is not, contrary to heterosexual pornography, implicated in
gender oppression, the importance of free speech and the complexity of all pornography
messages suggest that the state is not justified in suppressing sex expression relying on
the reification of a single viewpoint about its harmfulness. The Law, in limiting
pornography on the basis of the radical feminist rationale that assimilates it to hate
speech, ends up making strong and arbitrary claims to truth, that are premised on doubtful
assumptions, silence alternative knowledges, subjugate outsiders' experiences, and
contribute to the creation of oppressive social identities. I advise against censoring
pornography out of egalitarian concerns, and argue that, under certain conditions,
engagement with court litigation and the deployment of the rights discourse can be
promising strategies for lesbians and gay men challenging such obscenity laws.
Hate speech seems more evidently linked to discrimination than pornography, and
speech act theory suggests that it enacts a specific kind of subordination. However, the
role played by homophobic hate speech in perpetuating inequality for queers is limited
when compared to other social/discursive practices: thus hate speech laws are the easiest
but also, taken on their own, a largely ineffective way of responding to homophobia. As
such, these laws bear a presumption of being an unnecessary burden on freedom of
expression, a liberty that minorities have a vested interest in keeping as intact as possible.
Against homophobia a radical measure is required that, focusing on education, will
actively promote equality values. This remedy will be consistent with free speech
doctrine to the extent that hate speech will, setting apart some specific cases, escape
regulation, and that the State will assume an attitude directed to reaching understanding. / Law, Peter A. Allard School of / Graduate
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UBC/oai:circle.library.ubc.ca:2429/11037 |
| Date | 11 1900 |
| Creators | Zanghellini, Aleardo |
| Source Sets | University of British Columbia |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Text, Thesis/Dissertation |
| Format | 11026419 bytes, application/pdf |
| Rights | For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. |
Page generated in 0.0019 seconds