A central question in behavioural and evolutionary ecology is to understand how animals make decisions between, for instance, potential mates, nesting sites, foraging patches and territories. Normative models of choice usually predict preferences between alternatives by computing their value according to some criterion and then identifying the alternative with greatest value. An important consequence of this procedure is captured in the economic concept of rationality, defined through a number of principles that are necessary for the existence of a scale of value upon which organisms base their choices. Violations of rationality are nonetheless well documented in psychological and economic studies of human choice and consumer behaviour, and have forced a reinterpretation of much of the existing data and models. Although largely unexplored in the study of animal decision-making, the systematic observation of irrationality would similarly pose serious challenges for functional approaches to behaviour. In this thesis I explore the possibility that violations of rational axioms may also be found in animal choices, using the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris) as a model species. My objectives were threefold. Firstly, I investigated the prevalence of rationality across distinct foraging paradigms, in situations involving multialternative choices, structured choice sets, choices between alternatives described by multiple attributes and risk-sensitive decisions. In a number of distinct experiments, the preferences of the starlings were consistent and stable across contexts, conforming to basic rational principles such as transitivity and regularity. A second objective was to explore possible factors underlying reported violations of rational axioms by animals. Amongst potential mechanisms, I review and examine the implications of the use of hierarchical and higher order choice rules, as well as the presence of constraints on the perception of rewards. Finally, I examine the likely effect of contextual changes on an organism's state, and consequently choice behaviour, and experimentally confirm the expectation that statedependence in foraging preferences can underlie the observation of seemingly irrational behaviour. Altogether, my results suggest that, rather than being a common phenomenon, breaches of rationality in animals might be restricted to specific sets of parameters and conditions. They also emphasize the importance of considering the potential multitude of factors underlying violations of rationality in animal choices, and suggest that students of economic rationality in animal behaviour should also view preferences as a dynamic, statedependent measure.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:bl.uk/oai:ethos.bl.uk:275403 |
| Date | January 2003 |
| Creators | Schuck-Paim, Cynthia |
| Publisher | University of Oxford |
| Source Sets | Ethos UK |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Electronic Thesis or Dissertation |
| Source | http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:75f83ea4-01d6-4920-a7d8-0728b88da7da |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds