Return to search

Investigating cell death pathways in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis

BACKGROUND: Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (SJS/TEN) is the most severe form of cutaneous adverse drug reaction and is characterized by extensive epidermal destruction of the skin and mucosal surfaces. Controversy remains regarding the immunopathogenesis of the disease. It has long been assumed that CD8 cytotoxic T cells mediate cell death by releasing cytotoxic granules and soluble granulysin that trigger keratinocyte apoptosis. However, this does not explain the massive cell death or inflammation that is observed clinically. We have preliminary evidence from transcriptional profiling of patient skin samples suggesting that the cell death pathways necroptosis and pyroptosis may mediate SJS/TEN. Herein we utilize retrospectively and prospectively collected patient samples to investigate these cell death pathways.
OBJECTIVE: The goals of this study are two-fold: (i) to investigate cell death pathways in retrospectively-collected (SJS/TEN) patient skin samples and (ii) to directly test the cell death mediators and pathways mediating SJS/TEN using a novel in vitro model.
METHODS: Clinically and histopathologically confirmed SJS/TEN skin specimens and control skin specimens from non-blistering T cell mediated drug reactions and healthy skin were obtained following retrospective analysis from a multi-centered patient database. Gene expression profiling is being performed using the NanoString nCounter® System on these samples as a second patient cohort to confirm and expand on preliminary study findings. In parallel, we have optimized the use of a novel human skin platform for an in vitro model of SJS/TEN. We also collected human serum from a prospective study of SJS/TEN and control patients and have optimized and are actively collecting blister fluid from SJS/TEN and control patients in an ongoing prospective study for use in this model.
RESULTS: Through an extensive pathology database and medical record search of potential cases at Brigham and Women's Hospital, we identified a second patient cohort of SJS/TEN, non-blistering delayed-type drug hypersensitivity reactions and healthy controls. We identified and are collecting thorough demographic, clinical and laboratory data on 61 potential candidates for SJS/TEN, 4 for Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia Syndrome (DRESS), and 200 for Morbilliform Drug Eruptions (MDE). This second cohort is in the final step of analysis with review by an expert clinician to confirm cases. In parallel, we have designed an expansive gene panel to confirm cell death mediator and marker transcription in our bank of skin samples. This 815 gene panel uses the pre-designed panel from Nanostring®, spiked with an additional 30 genes specific to apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis. We reviewed multiple potential in vitro skin models and identified GenoSkin® as the most suitable human skin platform for our in vitro model. We collected serum from 6 SJS/TEN patients and 6 non-blistering drug reaction patients and 3 healthy controls, and are actively collecting blister fluid from SJS/TEN and thermal burn control patients for analysis in this model.
CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data suggest necroptosis and pyroptosis induced by soluble death mediators tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) as the main cell death pathways responsible for SJS/TEN. We have successfully identified a large number of potential patient samples of both cases and controls to perform transcriptional profiling using a self-designed gene panel to confirm and expand upon our preliminary data. We have successfully collected prospectively patient serum and are actively collecting patient blister fluid for analysis in an optimized in vitro model using GenoSkin®. SJS/TEN is severely understudied and lacks a standard protocol for care. This stems from uncertainty surrounding disease pathobiology. It is critical that we use innovative approaches to interrogate the mechanism mediating disease to advance the field, and, most importantly, to improve the quality of care for these patients.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:bu.edu/oai:open.bu.edu:2144/45528
Date27 January 2023
CreatorsAsemi, Natalie Rose
ContributorsDivito, Sherrie J., Slack, Barbara E.
Source SetsBoston University
Languageen_US
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis/Dissertation
RightsAttribution 4.0 International, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Page generated in 0.0021 seconds