Thesis presented in partial fulfilment for the degree of
Master of Management (in the field of Monitoring and
Evaluation) to the Faculty of Commerce, Law, and
Management, University of the Witwatersrand
December 2016 / The evaluation information has a critical role in informing decision making relating to
implementation of the development interventions. This study is underpinned by the fact that the
worth of evaluation information is determined by the extent of its influence on decision making.
It is premised from the fact that there is limited utilisation of the evaluation information for
decision making in the Gauteng Department of Health. Thus, the study is aimed at establishing
the underlying institutional features and evaluation characteristics that serve as facilitators and/or
barriers for the use of evaluation information.
Past studies are reviewed to identify the knowledge gap and develop a conceptual framework to
inform the research enquiry. Based on the purpose of the study and the conceptual framework, a
qualitative research strategy with interpretive case study design and a purposive sample are applied
to obtain in-depth description of the factors pertaining to the use of evaluation information. In
addition, three research theories are employed simultaneously to understand the subject
phenomenon and inform interpretation of the research findings, based on their unique concepts.
The triangulation method is applied in data collection and analysis to ensure reliability and validity
of the research results, with one-on-one semi-structured interviews conducted through an
interview guide.
The findings reveal that there are no systematic processes and procedures for identification of the
users and uses of the evaluation information prior to implementation of the evaluation process.
The emphasis on alignment of the evaluations to the institutional context is minimalistic in its
orientation since there is little focus on the broader development agenda. There is no
demonstration of facilitating inculcation of information use during the evaluation process. In
general, the evaluation systems are fragmented, with no formal reward system for encouraging
effective utility. The adoption and use of the evaluation findings hinges on the type of
recommendations versus the institutional development agenda and capacity. There are no formal
information dissemination strategies and procedures for confirming implementation of the
adopted evaluation recommendations. The role of the evaluation champions is limited and thus
manifested by low awareness and application of the evaluation policy framework and limited
institutionalisation of the evaluation function. Last, the findings highlight key institutional features
and evaluation characteristics that influence use and/or non-use of the evaluation information,
which should be considered in-line with the proposed recommendations. / MT2017
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:wits/oai:wiredspace.wits.ac.za:10539/23133 |
| Date | January 2017 |
| Creators | Sidzumo, Sibulele |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
| Format | Online resource (vi, 110 leaves), application/pdf |
Page generated in 0.0098 seconds