Making good predictions is a critical feature of decision making in situations such as investing and predicting the spread of diseases. Past literature indicates that people use recent and longer-term trends while making predictions. Nonetheless, less is known about how these factors affect how well people make predictions and the timing of their predictions. Further, identifying factors underlying predictive judgments could be an important behavioral factor in manic-depression, anxiety, substance use, age effects, and understanding how income inequality affects decision making. To understand how people make predictive judgments, we conducted two experiments. In Experiment 1, we used an investment task where participants had to predict the future price of a stock based on an exponential trend of information. We found that participants generally had lower earnings with steeper exponential trends (e.g. slower starting) and delayed their decisions to sell bad stocks with steeper trends. We extended these results in Experiment 2 with an updated task with exponential and inverse exponential trends. Overall, our results suggested that people delayed longer to make their prediction with slower starting exponential trends compared to faster starting inverse exponential trends and delayed their predictions longer with more linear trends compared to more trend trends. When deciding how long to explore, participants incorporated both the average trend and recent trend, though they shifted their responses depending on the overall functional form. These choices were ultimately biased to be optimistic or pessimistic based on whether the trend started fast or slow, respectively. Additionally, we found that participants who self-reported taking more gambling risk and depressive symptoms had a greater tendency to stay with faster starting trends and to leave with slower starting trends, suggesting they were even more optimistic given initially fast starting trends. Results pointing to an optimism bias based on the trend in information available to the participant could suggest that an aspect of sunk-cost fallacy is due to errors in predicting the likelihood of future success based on past information. Our findings help understand the dynamics of how people make predictive judgments over time and could inform future research into the mechanisms people use for prospective decision making. Additionally, future research and potential interventions could account for biases in how people perceive past trends to minimize harmful effects of sunk-cost fallacy when making predictions. / Psychology
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:TEMPLE/oai:scholarshare.temple.edu:20.500.12613/10623 |
| Date | 08 1900 |
| Creators | Sazhin, Daniel, 0000-0002-3497-1388 |
| Contributors | Smith, David V., Murty, Vishnu P., Helion, Chelsea, Giovannetti, Tania, Chein, Jason M., Shipley, Thomas F., McCloskey, Michael S. |
| Publisher | Temple University. Libraries |
| Source Sets | Temple University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis/Dissertation, Text |
| Format | 95 pages |
| Rights | IN COPYRIGHT- This Rights Statement can be used for an Item that is in copyright. Using this statement implies that the organization making this Item available has determined that the Item is in copyright and either is the rights-holder, has obtained permission from the rights-holder(s) to make their Work(s) available, or makes the Item available under an exception or limitation to copyright (including Fair Use) that entitles it to make the Item available., http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ |
| Relation | http://dx.doi.org/10.34944/dspace/10585, Theses and Dissertations |
Page generated in 0.0025 seconds