Interpretation of labour law regulations in the case law of The Supreme Court of the Czech Republic Abstract This thesis examines eight rulings of The Supreme Court of the Czech Republic that were handpicked for their extraordinary relevance in labour law. The author of this thesis attempts to find the solution to the problems solved by The Supreme Court in these rulings and then compares his reasoning and conclusions with the ones provided by The Supreme Court while evaluating the validity of the court's reasoning and conclusions along with whether The Supreme Court found its conclusions in a methodically sound manner. Rulings of cases No. 21 Cdo 4986/2010, 21 Cdo 224/2013, 21 Cdo 2745/2013, 21 Cdo 385/2014, 21 Cdo 5433/2014, 21 Cdo 3240/2015, 21 Cdo 1276/2016 and 21 Cdo 1276/2016 were the ones selected for analysis. The subject matter of the rulings listed above is as follows: When can an empoyer terminate a non- compete clause, whether or not specifying the applicable reason for termination in a medical opinion is needed in order to use said medical opinion as grounds for such termination, whether obstacle to work on the employee's part takes precedence over obstacle to work on the employer's part or vice versa, the relation between entitlement to severance pay and compensation provided by the Labour...
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:437189 |
| Date | January 2020 |
| Creators | Šteffek, Artur |
| Contributors | Tomšej, Jakub, Štefko, Martin |
| Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
| Language | Czech |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0019 seconds