Return to search

The effect of zirconia surface treatment on bond strength of various cement systems

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this in-vitro study is to evaluate the effect of different zirconia surface pretreatments, different cement types and the effect of accelerated aging on the adherence of bonding cements to zirconia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 64 zirconia 3Y-TZP tapered rings were pressed from TZ-3YSB-E zirconia powder, pre-treated with different surface treatments, then cemented to titanium abutment pins using 8 different cements: Maxcem Elite chroma (Kerr), TheraCem (Bisco), RelyX Unicem2 (3M ESPE), Multilink Automix (Ivoclar Vivadent), Panavia SA Cement Plus (Kuraray), Ceramir C&B (Doxa), CemEZ Universal (Zest Dental), and Bifix SE (VOCO). The partitally sintered zirconia specimens were divided according to design of experment (DOE). Zirconia surface treatments: 1) control group with no surface treatment, 2) airborne particle abrasion of fully sintered zirconia ring (FS-APA50), 3) airborne particle abrasion of partially sintered zirconia (PS-APA50), 4) tribochemical silica coating of fully sintered zirconia (FS-CoJet30), 5) tribochemical silica coating of partial sintered zirconia (PS-CoJet30), and 6) nano-structured alumina coating of fully sintered zirconia (NanoAl). Zirconia rings were subjected to post-treatment:1) control 24h incubation after cementing proceedure, and 2) accelerated aging . The pull-out axial tensile retention load was tested using an Instron Model 5566A. Multi factorial linear regression model (JMP Pro 15) was used for data analysis (α=0.05).
RESULTS: The retention force (N) of zirconia rings to titanium abutment pins was evaluated using a pull-out test. Four key factors were investigated in this study: zirconia surface pre-treatment, cement type, post-treatment and firing effect. There was a significant effect of zirconia surface pre-treatment on retention force (nano-structured alumina coating ≥ tribochemical abrasion = airborne-particle abrasion ≥ control). There was a significant effect of cement type on retention force [Multilink AM ≥ (Cem EZ = TheraCem = Panivia SA = RelyX Unicem2 = BiFix) ≥ Ceramir CB = Maxcem Elite]. There is a significant difference in retention strength to zirconia among post-treatment effect, with accelerated aging groups achieving slightly higher bond strength than 24h water storage groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant different retention loads were found among tested groups. Nano-structured alumina coating surface pre-treatment has significantly higher bond strength than other treatments. Some cement systems with functional monomer had significant higher bond strengths.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:bu.edu/oai:open.bu.edu:2144/42846
Date05 August 2021
CreatorsTashkandi, Abeer Khaled M.
ContributorsFan, Yuwei
Source SetsBoston University
Languageen_US
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis/Dissertation

Page generated in 0.0016 seconds