The goal of this research was to establish a methodology for quantifying performance of
surgeons and distinguishing skill levels during live surgeries. We integrated three
physical measures (kinematics, time and movement transitions) into a modeling
technique for quantifying performance of surgical trainees. We first defined a new
hierarchical representation called Motor and Cognitive Modeling Diagram for
laparoscopic procedures, which: (1) decomposes ‘tasks’ into ‘subtasks’ and at the very detailed level into individual movements ‘actions’; and (2) includes an explicit cognitive/motor diagrammatic representation that enables to take account of the operative variability as most intraoperative assessments are conducted at the ‘whole procedure’ level and do not distinguish between performance of trivial and complicated aspects of the procedure. Then, at each level of surgical complexity, we implemented specific mathematical techniques for providing a quantitative sense of how far a performance is located from a reference level:
(1) The Kolgomorov-Smirnov statistic to describe the similarity between two
empirical cumulative distribution functions (e.g., speed profiles)
(2) The symmetric normalized Jensen-Shannon Divergence to compare transition
probability matrices
(3) The Principal Component Analysis to identify the directions of greatest variability in a multidimensional space and to reduce the dimensionality of the data using a weight space.
Two experimental studies were completed in order to show feasibility of our proposed
assessment methodology by monitoring movements of surgical tools while: (1) dissecting mandarin oranges, and (2) performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures at the operating room to compare residents and expert surgeons when executing two surgical tasks: exposing Calot’s Triangle and dissecting the cystic duct and artery.
Results demonstrated the ability of our methodology to represent selected tasks using the Motor and Cognitive Modeling Diagram and to differentiate skill levels. We aim to use our approach in future studies to establish correspondences between specific surgical tasks and the corresponding simulations of these tasks, which may ultimately enable us to do validated assessments in a simulated setting, and to test its reliability in differentiating skill levels at the operating room as the number of subjects and procedures increase. / Applied Science, Faculty of / Mechanical Engineering, Department of / Graduate
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UBC/oai:circle.library.ubc.ca:2429/2835 |
Date | 05 1900 |
Creators | Cristancho, Sayra Magnolia |
Publisher | University of British Columbia |
Source Sets | University of British Columbia |
Language | English |
Detected Language | English |
Type | Text, Thesis/Dissertation |
Format | 9792035 bytes, application/pdf |
Rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds