Context. The intrusion detection systems are being widely used for detecting the malicious traffic in many industries and they use a variety of technologies. Each IDs had different architecture and are deployed for detecting malicious activity. Intrusion detection system has a different set of rules which can defined based on requirement. Therefore, choosing intrusion detection system for and the appropriate environment is not an easy task. Objectives. The goal of this research is to evaluate three most used open source intrusion detection systems in terms of performance. And we give details about different types of attacks that can be detected using intrusion detection system. The tools that we select are Snort, Suricata, OSSEC. Methods. The experiment is conducted using TCP, SCAN, ICMP, FTP attack. Each experiment was run in different traffic rates under normal and malicious traffics all rule are active. All these tests are conducted in a virtual environment. Results. We can calculate the performance of IDS by using CPU usage, memory usage, packet loss and a number of alerts generated. These results are calculated for both normal and malicious traffic. Conclusions. We conclude that results vary in different IDS for different traffic rates. Specially snort showed better performance in alerts identification and OSSEC in the performance of IDS. These results indicated that alerts are low when the traffic rates high are which indicates this is due to the packet loss. Overall OSSEC provides better performance. And Snort provides better performance and accuracy for alert detection.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:bth-15796 |
| Date | January 2017 |
| Creators | nagadevara, venkatesh |
| Publisher | Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Institutionen för datalogi och datorsystemteknik |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.1228 seconds