External cost from meat consumption raises an issue of possible government mechanisms toward mitigation. Economic theory provides a framework for determining the optimal set of mechanisms considering the associated benefits and costs. Such a theoretical development rests on the responsiveness of consumers to alternative mechanisms. Considering two mechanisms, a Pigouvian tax and green-label education, yields tandem theoretical optimal government mechanisms. Populating this theoretical model with empirically derived elasticities and other parameters provides an application. Results indicate education alone will likely not yield a high social-optimal level of mitigation. Instead, a Pigouvian tax will be required to move consumption toward a socially desired state. <br>
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:purdue.edu/oai:figshare.com:article/8938187 |
| Date | 14 August 2019 |
| Creators | Jonthan Webster Lawing (6983699) |
| Source Sets | Purdue University |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Text, Thesis |
| Rights | CC BY 4.0 |
| Relation | https://figshare.com/articles/Does_a_Meat_tax_Trump_Green_Label_Education_Effects/8938187 |
Page generated in 0.0023 seconds