Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2018-03-20T15:48:39Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
KatiaCileneFerreiraFranca_TESE.pdf: 868631 bytes, checksum: dc87a9baf5abb0ecec9a734f2691f701 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2018-03-21T13:54:22Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
KatiaCileneFerreiraFranca_TESE.pdf: 868631 bytes, checksum: dc87a9baf5abb0ecec9a734f2691f701 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-03-21T13:54:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
KatiaCileneFerreiraFranca_TESE.pdf: 868631 bytes, checksum: dc87a9baf5abb0ecec9a734f2691f701 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018-02-02 / Esta pesquisa tem como objeto de estudo a rela??o dial?gica entre o sujeito e o discurso outro
que constr?i a filia??o te?rica na escrita do pesquisador em forma??o, especificamente em teses
de doutorado. Partindo da perspectiva de que o dialogismo ? o fundamento da linguagem
(BAKHTIN/VOLOCHINOV, 2006), de que todo enunciado se faz em meio a j?-ditos e como
tal carrega uma genealogia (BAKHTIN,2003), observ?vel na materialidade da l?ngua,
elaboramos nossas quest?es de pesquisa: Como o dialogismo engendra a filia??o te?rica na
escrita acad?mica? O que as formas lingu?sticas mostram sobre a genealogia que estabelece
essa escrita? Nossa hip?tese ? de que a filia??o te?rica ? um processo produtor de sentidos,
poss?vel de ser observado e compreendido a partir de uma s?rie de opera??es lingu?sticodiscursivas
realizadas pelo sujeito, que elabora sua escrita em di?logo com diferentes vozes.
Definimos como objetivo geral compreender como o dialogismo engendra a filia??o a partir do
levantamento e da an?lise de opera??es lingu?stico-discursivas observ?veis na materialidade de
teses de doutorado. A constru??o da d?vida, da hip?tese, do objetivo e a busca de respostas
baseia-se ainda nos estudos enunciativos de Benveniste (2005,2006) e Authier-Revuz (1998,
2004) sobre a rela??o entre o sujeito e o discurso outro, impressa nas formas da l?ngua, e nos
estudos antropol?gicos de L?vi-Strauss (1982) sobre o peso da cultura para a forma??o de
fam?lias e para funcionamento de sistemas de parentesco no qual os membros assumem lugares
e fun??es distintas. Esse di?logo interdisciplinar fez emergir perguntas espec?ficas sobre: Que
tipo de vozes o sujeito convoca para mostrar-se como filiado? Como dialoga com elas? Que
lugar e fun??o s?o atribu?dos ?s vozes convocadas? Tomamos como corpus um conjunto de
teses de doutorado, coletadas na biblioteca virtual Dom?nio P?blico. Tratamos,
metodologicamente, essas opera??es lingu?stico-discursivas como ind?cios (GINZBURG,
1989) que deixam ver e categorizar as vozes que constituem a filia??o te?rica. Os resultados
obtidos confirmam a hip?tese levantada e mostram que, pela materialidade da escrita, ? poss?vel
observar distintos arranjos familiares, definidos a partir do di?logo que o pesquisador estabelece
com a voz do outro em diferentes n?veis de alteridade. / This research has as object of study the dialogical relationship between the subject and the other
discourse that builds a theoretical affiliation in the writing of the researcher in formation,
specifically in doctoral thesis. From the perspective that dialogism is the language foundation
(BAKHTIN / VOLOCHINOV, 2006), that every statement is made in the midst of the alreadysaid
and as such carries a genealogy (BAKHTIN, 2003), observable in the materiality of
language, we elaborate our research questions: How does dialogism engender the theoretical
affiliation in academic writing? What do linguistic forms show about a genealogy that
establishes this writing? Our hypothesis is that theoretical affiliation is a process that produces
meanings, which can be observed and understood from a series of linguistic-discursive
operations carried out by the subject, who elaborates his writing in dialogue with different
voices. We define as general objective to understand how the dialogism engenders the
affiliation from the survey and the analysis of linguistic-discursive operations observable in the
materiality of doctoral theses. The construction of doubt, hypothesis, objective and the search
for answers is still based on the enunciative studies of Benveniste (2005, 2006) and Authier-
Revuz (1998, 2004) on a relation between the subject and the other discourse printed in the
language forms and in the anthropological studies of L?vi-Strauss (1982) on the weight of
culture for the formation of families and for the functioning of kinship systems, in which
members assume different places and functions. This interdisciplinary dialogue has raised
specific questions about: What kind of voices does the subject call to show himself as an
affiliate? How does he dialogue with them? What place and function are assigned to the called
voices? We took as corpus a set of doctoral theses, collected in the virtual library Dom?nio
P?blico. We deal, methodologically, with these linguistic-discursive operations as indications
(GINZBURG, 1989) that let us see and categorize the voices that constitute the theoretical
affiliation. The results confirm the hypothesis raised, show that through the materiality of
writing it is possible to observe different familiar arrangements, defined from the dialogue that
the researcher establishes with the voice of the other in different levels of otherness.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/24926 |
Date | 02 February 2018 |
Creators | Fran?a, Katia Cilene Ferreira |
Contributors | 58075259149, Oliveira, Maria Bernadete Fernandes de, 04761391472, Alves, Maria da Penha Casado, 24162906491, Mugschl, Sonia Maria Correa Pereira, 08067546304, Fairchild, Thomas Massao, 29675741805, Campos, Sulemi Fabiano |
Publisher | PROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM ESTUDOS DA LINGUAGEM, UFRN, Brasil |
Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
Language | Portuguese |
Detected Language | English |
Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0174 seconds