Return to search

A comparison of selected areas of thinking styles between cooperating teachers and university supervisors

The purposes of this study were to ascertain the thinking styles of a selected sample group of cooperating teachers and university supervisors and to denote the differences between the thinking styles. The populations included 122 selected cooperating teachers and 31 selected university supervisors.Cooperating teachers and university supervisors completed the Level 1: Life Styles Inventory which contained 240 short phrases and words producing a twelve-dimension thinking style. Seventy-two cooperating teachers and twenty-five university supervisors were included in data analysis.Thinking style profiles of cooperating teachers and university supervisors were derived from mean and standard deviation scores on twelve thinking style scales.Twelve null hypotheses were tested to identify thinking style differences between cooperating teachers and university supervisors on twelve scales. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) followed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were the statistical treatments utilized to analyze data at the .05 level. Analysis of data relevant to total Level 1: Life Style Inventory responses and to each hypothesis resulted in the following findings: 1. Mean responses of participating cooperating teachers and university supervisors indicated strong orientations toward humanistic-helpful, affiliative, achievement, and self-actualized dimensions of thinking style.2. No significant differences existed between cooperating teachers and university supervisors on the twelve thinking style scales considered collectively.3. Individual thinking style scales with no significant differences were:(a) humanistic-helpful, (b) affiliative, (c) approval, (d) dependent, (e) avoidance, (f) oppositional, (g) power, (h) competition, (i) competence, (j) achievement, and (f) self-actualization.4. A significant difference existed between cooperatingteachers and university supervisors on the thinking style scale classified as "conventional."

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:BSU/oai:cardinalscholar.bsu.edu:handle/175564
Date03 June 2011
CreatorsCleary, Michael James
ContributorsJones, Donald W.
Source SetsBall State University
Detected LanguageEnglish
Format3, vii, 108 leaves ; 28 cm.
SourceVirtual Press

Page generated in 0.0015 seconds