Return to search

Validity and reliability of four language mapping paradigms

Language areas of the brain can be mapped in individual participants with functional MRI. We investigated the validity and reliability of four language mapping paradigms that may be appropriate for individuals with acquired aphasia: sentence completion, picture naming, naturalistic comprehension, and narrative comprehension. Five neurologically normal older adults were scanned on each of the four paradigms on four separate occasions. Validity was assessed in terms of whether activation patterns reflected the known typical organization of language regions, that is, lateralization to the left hemisphere, and involvement of the left inferior frontal gyrus and the left middle and/or superior temporal gyri. Reliability (test-retest reproducibility) was quantified in terms of the Dice coefficient of similarity, which measures overlap of activations across time points. We explored the impact of different absolute and relative voxelwise thresholds, a range of cluster size cutoffs, and limitation of analyses to a priori potential language regions. We found that the narrative comprehension and sentence completion paradigms offered the best balance of validity and reliability. However, even with optimal combinations of analysis parameters, there were many scans on which known features of typical language organization were not demonstrated, and test-retest reproducibility was only moderate for realistic parameter choices. These limitations in terms of validity and reliability may constitute significant limitations for many clinical or research applications that depend on identifying language regions in individual participants. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:arizona.edu/oai:arizona.openrepository.com:10150/626091
Date January 2017
CreatorsWilson, Stephen M., Bautista, Alexa, Yen, Melodie, Lauderdale, Stefanie, Eriksson, Dana K.
ContributorsUniv Arizona, Dept Speech Language & Hearing Sci, Univ Arizona, Dept Neurol, Univ Arizona, Dept Linguist
PublisherELSEVIER SCI LTD
Source SetsUniversity of Arizona
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeArticle
Rights© 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
Relationhttp://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2213158216300560

Page generated in 0.0021 seconds