Under consideration are the temple layouts at Delphi and the Athenian Acropolis which were shaped in
completely different ways. What they have in common, however, is that both represent an architecture
on two hierarchic levels: the upper or sacred level as symbolised by the eternal principle expressed in
both elevated Doric temples, which are placed in dramatic juxtaposition with features in their natural
settings (earth, horizon, sky); and the lower, human level which is represented by the auxiliary buildings
of the approach areas of these temple complexes. The latter buildings are smaller than the main
temples and are marked by complexity and ambiguity in that they are imperfect, of varied design
and not oriented to a geometric axis, which is in complete contrast to the serenity of the fully articulated
superior Doric order exemplified by the Temple of Apollo at Delphi and the Parthenon on the
Athenian Acropolis. In both cases the focus will be on the perceptual totality of the group designs.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:tut/oai:encore.tut.ac.za:d1001354 |
| Date | January 2007 |
| Creators | Mare, EA, Rapanos, A |
| Publisher | South African Journal of Art History |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Text |
| Format | |
| Rights | South African Journal of Art History |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds