Return to search

Stress in the SA Navy: Piloting and evaluating the validity and reliability of a developed therapeutic recreation stress leisure and appraisal tool

Philosophiae Doctor - PhD / The nature of naval member’s job demands is that they experience high levels of stress. Stress
is introduced in military training to familiarize sailors with real life stressors. This study is
located in piloting and validity theory. It focuses explicitly on validating an existing tool, the
Therapeutic Recreation Stress Leisure Appraisal Tool, to measure stress in the South African
Navy. This study aimed to pilot and evaluate the validity and reliability of the developed tool
in an African context in the South African Navy. A multi-stage procedure of instrument
development using the instrument development model will be used, consisting of the following
steps: 1) preliminary phase, 2) questionnaire development, 3) pilot testing, and 4) evaluation.
The scope of this study, is only focused on stages three and four. The current study followed
an explanatory sequential mixed-method design. In this study, the qualitative phase was done
first, followed by the quantitative phase. The mixed-method design is used to build upon the
same research questions. PHASE 1, the pilot-testing phase (qualitative, n=50), explored if the
developed appraisal tool is interpreted correctly and contains the necessary applicable
questions. This population and sample were purposefully selected from the navy. Data were
collected in focus groups taking place at a naval base. Five focus groups of ten members each
were completed using interview schedules. Recorded data was transcribed verbatim. Data were
analysed using thematic analysis with data coding to extract themes. This study is an extension
of from a masters study linked to the current study, which contributed towards the finalisation
of the questionnaire. Iterative exploratory factor analyses were used at the item and scale levels
to select and reassign the items and scales. PHASE 2, the evaluation phase (quantitative,
n=1000), determined the validity and reliability of the refined, developed appraisal tool. The
population (N=7000) and sample (n=1000) consisted of senior and junior ranks from the officer
core, conveniently selected from a naval base. PHASE 1 informed PHASE 2, the evaluation
phase.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:uwc/oai:etd.uwc.ac.za:11394/8873
Date January 2021
CreatorsCozett, Marlin
ContributorsYoung, Marie
Source SetsSouth African National ETD Portal
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
RightsUniversity of the Western Cape

Page generated in 0.0023 seconds