Abstract
The tool wear characteristics of the hydrodynamic polishing process under various lubricating conditions are examined in this study. Both the experimental and theoretical studies will be done in this paper. In the experimental study, the relationships between tool wear and its possible influential factors will be examined. In the theoretical study, the mathematical model will be established to interpret the qualitative and quantitative relationships between tool wear characteristics and various operating parameters.
For the experimental study, a series of experiments will be done to investigate the effect of various factors on the tool wear and machining rate, under non-contact or semi-contact lubricating condition. The factors may include the tool¡¦s angular speed, the applied load, the tool¡¦s surface irregularities, the slurry viscosity, and the properties of tool, workpiece and abrasive particle (such as surface energy). To establish the mathematical model, the principle of dynamics, law of minimum potential energy and elasto-hydrodynamic lubricating theorem of hydrodynamic polishing process are adopted to derive the removal rate model of a particle under differential contact conditions or under various material parameters (such as surface energies or speed constants) from the energy point of view. In addition, the wear rate of tool is to be analyzed. To deal with the random nature of tool¡¦s surface irregularities, the probability theory is applied to calculate the average wear rate of tool, under semi-contact or non-contact condition or under various material parameters.
It is shown that both the tool waviness and radius of tool curvature changed and had specific trends in the wear process. Especially, the wear rate of tool under semi-contact lubricating condition was not necessarily large than that under the non-contact one. The experimental data indicated that the effects of tool wear on machining rate highly depended on the lubricating condition of tool. The trend of machining rate versus accumulated machining time under non-contact lubricating condition was very different from that under the semi-contact one.
A mathematical model relating the removal capability of an abrasive particle at the tool¡¦s or workpiece¡¦s surface and various operating parameters are proposed. The qualitative properties of removal capability the under different material parameters and various contact conditions are obtained by the computer simulations. The analysis indicates that the relationships between the removal capability and various material parameters (such as surface energies of adhesion or operating conditions) are not monotonic. Under the contact condition, it is shown that the tool¡¦s surface energy of adhesion and the speed constant has a negative effect on the removal capability at tool¡¦s surface. On the other hand, the surface energy of adhesion on work and the speed constants have a positive effect on the removal capability at tool¡¦s surface. For the workpiece, the converse implications are also true. Three types of patterns for removal capability at tool¡¦s surface due to the degree of embedding of a particle were obtained. There are increase or first increase then decrease or decrease directly, respectively. Under non-contact condition, it is shown that the removal capability has a negative relationship with local film thickness.
In addition, a mathematical model relating the tool or work piece wear rate and various operating parameters are also proposed. The qualitative properties of tool wear rate under various lubricating conditions are obtained by the simple statistic analysis. The analysis indicates that the relationships between tool and workpiece wear rate and various parameters are also not monotonic. Under non-contact condition, the tool or workpiece wear rate will first increase then decrease due to the tool periphery speed increase. The magnitude of wear rate will decrease or increase due to the material parameters. Under the semi-contact condition, the up-and-down trend is also occurred in the relationship between tool or workpiece wear rate and the tool periphery speed. Accordingly, the relationships between wear rate and tool periphery speed, in a lubricating range covering the non-contact and semi-contact conditions, will reveal a twin-peak pattern. Generally, the workpiece wear rate under the semi-contact condition is not less than the non-contact one. However, the tool wear rate under the semi-contact condition is not necessarily large than the non-contact one. For a specific condition, under the semi-contact condition, the magnitude of the tool wear rate under different speed will increase or decrease by choosing different tool¡¦s surface adhesive energy and speed constant and the relationship between tool wear rate and tool speed will become complex. The wear rate could increase or decrease significantly. In other word, the tool wear rate under the semi-contact condition may be smaller or large than the non-contact one. Hence, a tool with large surface adhesive energy and speed constant should have a lower tool wear rate or higher work wear rate under certain lubricating regime. Finally, the experimental study tests that the proposed model is closely related with the experimental data.
The study showed that the qualitative trends of experimental data are consistent with the analytical predictions. Some of the qualitative relationships between tool wear and machining rate could be properly explained from the elasto-hydrodynamic lubrication theorem and the proposed wear theorem for hydrodynamic polishing process.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:NSYSU/oai:NSYSU:etd-0702101-131700 |
| Date | 02 July 2001 |
| Creators | Hung, Tu-Chich |
| Contributors | Kuo-Shong Wang, Kuang-Hua Fuh, Yaw-Terng Su |
| Publisher | NSYSU |
| Source Sets | NSYSU Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Archive |
| Language | Cholon |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0702101-131700 |
| Rights | unrestricted, Copyright information available at source archive |
Page generated in 0.0026 seconds