A serious problem confronts the psychologist whose patient threatens, within the privacy of a therapy session, to inflict violent harm upon some third person. Therapists in Texas face a risk of unjust legal liability because of a lack of widely accepted, clearly and fully articulated standards. A questionnaire was submitted to Texas psychologists and Texas judges of mental illness courts. It involved a hypothetical case of a patient who threatened to kill his girlfriend. The hypothesis that no consensus exists at present among psychologists or judges appears to be supported by the data. Comparisons are made of the attitudes of psychologists and judges. Correlations between psychologist attitudes and certain demographic and practice variables are reported. The need for new legislation in Texas concerning legal liability of therapists for the violent behavior of patients is discussed. Proposed legislation for Texas is set out. Among its important features are (1) recognition that continued therapy is itself a protective strategy and (2) establishment of good faith as the standard by which the behavior of the therapist is to be judged.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:unt.edu/info:ark/67531/metadc331002 |
| Date | 08 1900 |
| Creators | Morgan, Minor Latham |
| Contributors | Peek, Leon A., Gordon, Robert, Burke, Angela J., Lewis, Franklin D. |
| Publisher | North Texas State University |
| Source Sets | University of North Texas |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis or Dissertation |
| Format | iv, 197 leaves, Text |
| Coverage | United States - California, United States - Texas |
| Rights | Public, Morgan, Minor Latham, Copyright, Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds