This study provides a feminist analysis of protective labor legislation in the Supreme Court case of UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc. History of protection rhetoric and precedented cases leading up to UAW are provided. Using a feminist analysis, this study argues that the victory for women's labor rights in UAW is short lived, and the cycle of protection rhetoric continues with new pro-business agendas replacing traditional justifications for "protecting" women in the work place. The implications of this and other findings are discussed.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:unt.edu/info:ark/67531/metadc279082 |
Date | 12 1900 |
Creators | Lowery, Christina |
Contributors | DeLoach, Mark B. (Mark Benson), Sahlin, Claire L., Bruner, Michael S. |
Publisher | University of North Texas |
Source Sets | University of North Texas |
Language | English |
Detected Language | English |
Type | Thesis or Dissertation |
Format | iv, 116 leaves, Text |
Coverage | United States |
Rights | Public, Copyright, Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved., Lowery, Christina |
Page generated in 0.0019 seconds