Return to search

Značaj tumorskih markera CA125 i HE4, konvencionalne i dopler transvaginalne sonografije u dijagnostici karcinoma jajnika / The importance of tumor markers CA125 and HE4, conventional and Doppler transvaginal ultrasound in diagnosis of ovarian cancer

<p>Uvod: Karcinom jajnika predstavlja značajan zdravstveni problem.Karakteri&scaron;e ga najveća smrtnost od svih ginekolo&scaron;kih maligniteta. Najveći broj slučajeva karcinoma jajnika dijagostikuje se u uznapredovalim stadijumima bolesti (FIGO st. III i IV), kod kojih petogodi&scaron;nje preživljavanje iznosi ispod 30%, dok se svega 25% slučajeva otkrije u prvom stadijumu gde petogodi&scaron;nje preživljavanje iznosi preko 90%. Do danas nije otkrivena dijagnostička metoda za rano otkrivanje početnog karcinoma jajnika u op&scaron;toj populaciji koja je dovoljno osetljiva i specifična da bi se koristila kao &bdquo;screening&ldquo; metoda. Uspeh u lečenju karcinoma jajnika direktno zavisi od rano postavljene dijagnoze. Cilj istraživanja: Utvrditi značaj tumorskih markera Ca125, HE4, Roma indexa, konvencionalne i dopler transvaginalne sonografije u dijagnostici karcinoma jajnika. Metodologija: Istraživanje je sprovedeno kao prospektivna klinička studija, na Klinici za ginekologiju i aku&scaron;erstvo u Novom Sadu. Ispitivanjem je obuhvaćeno 238 pacijenktinja sa adneksalnim tumorom za operativno lečenje. Preoperativno svim pacijentkinjama je uzeta detaljna anamneza, urađen konvencionalni i dopler transvaginalni ultrazvučni pregled i uzeta krv za određivanje tumorskih markera CA125, HE4, Roma indexa. U zavisnosti od definitivnog patohistolo&scaron;kog nalaza pacijentkinje su podeljene u dve grupe. Grupu A ili ispitivanu grupu su činile ispitanice sa karcinomom i border line tumorima,a grupu B ili kontrolnu grupu,pacijentkinje sa benignim tumorima jajnika. Rezultati: Prosečna starost pacijentkinja je 53 godine. U ukupnom ispitivanom uzorku bilo je statistički značajno vi&scaron;e pacijentkinja u premenopauzi(59,2%) u odnosu na postmenopauzalne pacijentkinje. U ispitivanoj grupi najče&scaron;će zastupljen patohistolo&scaron;ki tip karcinoma je high-grade serozni cistadenokarcinom. Kod najvećeg broja pacijentkinja(49,4%) karcinom je dijagnostikovan u I stadijumu bolesti. U diferencijaciji karcinoma jajnika i benignih tumora jajnika, AUC vrednosti za HE4,Ca125 i Roma index su 0.933, 0.831 i 0.932. Senzitivnost HE4,Ca125,Roma indexa iznosi 0.797/ 0.734 / 0.823. Specifičnost HE4,Ca125, Roma indexa je 0.881 / 0.838 / 0.774. Senzitivnost konvencionalne i dopler transvaginalne sonografije je 0,937/ 0,750, a specifičnost je 0,736/ 0,931 respektivno.Kod pacijentkinja sa endometriozom, vrednost tumorskog markera HE4 je povi&scaron;ena samo kod 6% pacijentkinja, za razliku od vrednosti Ca125 koje su povi&scaron;ene kod 76% pacijentkinja sa endometriozom. Zaključak: Najsnažniji prediktori u diferencijaciji karcinoma od benignih tumora jajnika su: tumorski marker HE4, Roma index, indeks otpora protoku krvi kroz tumorsko tkivo (RI), neravan unutra&scaron;nji zid tumora i ekrescencije unutar tumora. Najbolju senzitivnost u detekciji karcinoma jajnika pokazala je konvencionalna transvaginalna sonografija u odnosu na druge dve ispitivane metode, dok najbolju specifičnost u odvajanju benignih tumora od karcinoma jajnika pokazuje dopler transvaginalna sonografija.</p> / <p>Background: Ovarian cancer represents very important world health issue. It is characterized by the highest mortality rate of all gynecological malignancies. The majority of ovarian cancer cases are diagnosed in advanced stages (FIGO III and IV) in which 5 year survival rate is less than 30%, and only 25% of cases are diagnosed in stage I with survival rate of 90%. So far no diagnostic method has been discovered that is specific and accurate enough to diagnose ovarian cancer in early stage in general population, so that it can be used as screening method. Success rate of treatment of ovarian cancer is dependent on the stage in which the diagnosis has been made. Objective: to determine the importance of tumor markers CA 125, HE4, Roma index, conventional and Doppler transvaginal ultrasound in diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Method: Research was undertaken as prospective study at Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics in Novi Sad. The analysis included 238 women with adnexal tumors indicated for surgery. Preoperatively detailed medical history, blood analysis (CA125,HE4,ROMA index), conventional and Doppler transvaginal ultrasound were done for all patients. Patients were divided into two groups depending on their definite pathohistological finding. Group A included patients with carcinoma and border line tumors. Group B (control group) included patients with benign ovarian tumors. Results: Average age of patient was 53 years. More patients were premenopausal (59.2%). The most frequent pathohistological type of carcinoma was high grade serous cystadenocarcinoma. In most cases diagnosis was made in stage I (49.4%). In differentiation between ovarian carcinoma and benign ovarian tumors AUC for HE4, Ca125and Roma index were 0.933,0.831,0.932. Sensitivity of HE4,Ca125 and Roma index is 0.797,0.734,0.832. Specificity of HE4,Ca125 and Roma index is 0.881,0.838,0.774. Sensitivity of conventional and transvaginal ultrasound is 0.937, 0.750, and specificity is 0.736 and 0.931 respectively. In patients with endometriosis tumor marker HE4 levels were elevated in only 6% of cases, while Ca125 levels were elevated in 76% of cases. Conclusion: The most important predictors in carcinoma/benign tumor differentiation are tumor markers HE4, Roma index, RI, uneven inner walls of tumor and ekrescency inside tumor. The highest sensitivity in ovarian cancer detection showed conventional transvaginal ultrasound when compared to two other used methods. The highest specificity in carcinoma/bening tumor differentiation showed doppler transvaginal ultrasound.</p>

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:uns.ac.rs/oai:CRISUNS:(BISIS)100483
Date10 June 2016
CreatorsPantelić Miloš
ContributorsĆurčić Aleksandar, Đurđević Srđan, Mandić Aljoša, Kutlešić Ranko, Belopavlović Zoran, Vejnović Tihomir
PublisherUniverzitet u Novom Sadu, Medicinski fakultet u Novom Sadu, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine at Novi Sad
Source SetsUniversity of Novi Sad
LanguageSerbian
Detected LanguageUnknown
TypePhD thesis

Page generated in 0.003 seconds