This thesis assesses three United States Supreme Court opinions, engaging in an inductive approach to generic criticism, in an attempt to discover whether or not there are similarities and/or differences in these decisions. This study focuses on draft card, flag, and cross burning cases argued before the Court in order to discover the potential genre's characteristics.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:unt.edu/info:ark/67531/metadc277949 |
| Date | 05 1900 |
| Creators | Pollard, Donald Kent |
| Contributors | DeLoach, Mark, Lowry, Bullitt, 1936-, Gossett, John S. |
| Publisher | University of North Texas |
| Source Sets | University of North Texas |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis or Dissertation |
| Format | iv, 130 leaves, Text |
| Rights | Public, Copyright, Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved., Pollard, Donald Kent |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds