This study examined the role and function of public relations in public higher education institutions by focusing on the messages being communicated by four public
research-oriented universities. This study was designed to determine if and how these
universities communicate their public good responsibility and how that communication is
perceived by two constituent groups—higher education reporters and state legislators. The researcher used two qualitative methods: thematic analysis and in-depth/elite
interviews. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the universities’ mission and vision
statements, strategic plans, legislative appropriations requests, presidential speeches, and
800 press releases (200 from each of four universities), to determine whether references
to the public good were either present or absent in messages the universities disseminated
during 2006 and 2007. In-depth/elite interviews were used to obtain the perspectives of
the chief public relations officers at each of the four public research-oriented universities
about their public relations strategies and communication goals. Higher education reporters covering these respective institutions and members of the legislature in
positions of leadership on committees involved with higher education policy and funding
issues were also interviewed to understand their perceptions about the universities. This study found the following 24 references to public good: the core concepts of
research, teaching and public service; the benefits the universities create as engines of
economic development; diversity; the recruitment and retention of faculty; the university
as a center for arts, entertainment and cultural events; faculty and student achievement;
student career enhancement; and institutional prestige, among others. The study demonstrated that public research-oriented universities are using public
relations strategies and techniques to construct and distribute messages to their key
constituents about the benefits they provide to the State and its citizens. Major findings also include the observation that higher education reporters cover higher education as a statewide beat which focuses on the state’s two flagship or Tier 1 universities—the
University of Texas at Austin and Texas A&M University and the institutions in the reporters respective cities. In addition, the higher education reporters write about “issues” related to higher education rather than institutions per se. The study also found that State Legislators only recognize the two Tier 1 institutions as research institutions
and their perspectives about these institutions are driven by how these universities are funded. / text
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UTEXAS/oai:repositories.lib.utexas.edu:2152/6653 |
| Date | 23 October 2009 |
| Creators | Wilson, Terry Angelo |
| Source Sets | University of Texas |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Format | electronic |
| Rights | Copyright is held by the author. Presentation of this material on the Libraries' web site by University Libraries, The University of Texas at Austin was made possible under a limited license grant from the author who has retained all copyrights in the works. |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds