For the evaluation of this diploma thesis I have chosen four different processing machines with various working organs. There were reversible plow Lemken Opal 90, plate cultivator Horsch Joker 8 RT, blade cultivator Farmet Duolent DX 300 N and combined cultivator Väderstad TopDown TD 500. Raitings were carried out on lands with very similar features to get the most advantageous possible comparison. The thesis contains characteristics of the companies and technical data of compared machines, where the machines differences are obvious, because each machine is designed and assembled for different purpose of soil processing. The fact is that each machine excelled in different type of measuring from the qualitative indicators' point of view. The best cultivation of plant residues came from the plow Lemken Opal 90. On the other hand, Väderstad TopDown TD 500 had the most decaying effect on post-harvest residues.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:375771 |
| Date | January 2018 |
| Creators | PIŠL, Stanislav |
| Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
| Language | Czech |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0072 seconds