Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:16:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
WanessaAB_DISSERT.pdf: 3799185 bytes, checksum: ce77744774059676a04175b60c73d121 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2014-03-26 / The synthetic guanylhydrazones WE010 (3,5-di-tert-butil-4-hidroxibenzaldehyde-guanylhydrazone), WE014 (4-bifenilcarboxialdehydeguanylhydrazone) and WE017 (3,4-diclorobenzaldehydeguanylhydrazone) showed high cytotoxic activity in terms of percentage inhibition of cancer cells growth. However, further progress in the development of these drug candidates requires precise and convenient methods for their qualitative and quantitative analyses. The aim of this study was to develop and validate High Performance Liquid Chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLC-DAD) and Ultra Fast Liquid Chromatography with diode-array detection (UFLC-DAD) methods suitable for as simultaneous as isolated determination of studied guanylhydrazones, based on the optimization of chromatographic parameters and obtaining reduced detection times. The chromatographic analyses of analytes by HPLC were performed on C18 ACE analytical column (150 mm x 4.6 mm), with a particle size of 5.0 ?m. Among all the conditions assayed, the best results of separation were obtained with a mixture of methanol:water (60:40, v/v) as the mobile phase at a flow rate 1.5mL/min and pH of 3.5 adjusted at acetic acid. The UFLC method was developed by experimetal desing techniques in order to find optimal chromatographic analytical conditions, which were achieved on XR-ODS analytical column (50 mm x 3.0 mm), with a particle size of 2,2 ?m, maintained at 25 ?C. The mobile phase was consisted of methanol:water (65:35, v/v) with 0.1% triethylamine (TEA) and pH of 3.5 adjusted at acetic acid, at a flow rate 0.5 mL/min. The procedure were validated following evaluating parameters such as specificity, linearity, limits of detection (LD) and quantification (LQ), precision, accuracy and robustness, giving results within the acceptable range. Although the UFLC method shows better sensitivity (lower values of LD and LQ), robustness (lower rates of relative standard deviation) and minimize spending time and solvent, both developed methods were adequately applied to the analysis of guanylhydrazones molecules, may be used in routine of quality control laboratories.
Keywords: guanylhydrazones, HPLC/DAD, UFLC/DAD, validation of analitical method / As guanilhidrazonas sint?ticas WE010 (3,5-di-tert-butil-4-hidroxibenzalde?do-guanilhidrazona), WE014 (4-bifenilcarboxialde?doguanilhidrazona) e WE017 (3,4-diclorobenzalde?doguanilhidrazona) apresentaram alta atividade citot?xica em rela??o a inibi??o do crescimento de c?lulas cancer?genas. Contudo, o avan?o no desenvolvimento desses candidatos a f?rmacos necessitam de m?todos precisos para suas adequadas an?lises quantitativas e qualitativas. O objetivo desse estudo foi desenvolver e validar m?todos por Cromatografia L?quida de Alta Efici?cia com Detector de Arranjo Diodo (CLAE-DAD) e Cromatografia L?quida de Ultra Efici?cia com Detector de Arranjo Diodo (CLUE-DAD) adequados para a determina??o simult?nea, bem como isolada das guanilhidrazonas em estudo, baseado na otimiza??o de par?metros cromatogr?ficos e obten??o de tempos reduzidos de detec??o. As an?lises cromatogr?ficas por CLAE foram realizadas numa coluna anal?tica C18 ACE (150 mm x 4,6 mm), com tamanho de part?cula de 5,0 ?m. Dentre as condi??es analisadas, os melhores resultados de separa??o foram obtidos com uma fase m?vel composta por metanol:?gua (60:40), em um fluxo de 1,5 mL/min. e um pH de 3,5 ajustado com ?cido ac?tico. O m?todo por CLUE foi desenvolvido a partir de t?cnicas de planejamento fatorial, com o objetivo de se encontrar as melhores condi??es anal?ticas, que foram obtidas a partir de an?lise em uma coluna XR-ODS (50 mm x 3,0 mm), com tamanho de part?cula de 2,2 ?m, mantida a 25 ?C. A fase m?vel foi constitu?da por metanol:?gua (65:35) com 0,1% de Trietilamina (TEA) e pH de 3,5 ajustado com ?cido ac?tico. Os procedimentos foram validados a partir da avalia??o de par?metros de especificidade, linearidade, limites de detec??o (LD) e quantifica??o (LQ), precis?o exatid?o e robustez, obtendo-se resultados dentro do intervalo aceit?vel. Embora o m?todo por CLUE tenha mostrado melhor sensibilidade (menores valores de LD e LQ), robustez (menores ?ndices de desvio padr?o relativo) e minimizado gastos de tempo e solvente, ambos os m?todos desenvolvidos foram adequadamente aptos para as an?lises das mol?culas de guanilhidrazonas, podendo ser utilizados na rotina de laborat?rios de controle de qualidade
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/13507 |
| Date | 26 March 2014 |
| Creators | Brito, Wanessa Azevedo de |
| Contributors | CPF:02820912460, http://lattes.cnpq.br/1689823596741892, Langassner, Silvana Maria Zucolotto, CPF:81995725072, http://lattes.cnpq.br/7390416147619446, Souza, F?bio Santos de, CPF:92771300400, http://lattes.cnpq.br/4903883301058477, Arag?o, C?cero Fl?vio Soares, Gomes, Ana Paula Barreto |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Farmac?uticas, UFRN, BR, Bioan?lises e Medicamentos |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds