Assessing Virtual Versus In-Person Experiential Learning in Medical Student Pediatric Clerkship Training
Andrew Berry, Andrew Wigger, Karilynn Craig, Dr. Brock Blankenship, Dr. Jennifer Gibson, Center for Experiential Learning, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN.
Simulation and experiential training have been incorporated into medical school training for decades. While there are many ways to accomplish experiential-based learning, many faculty and students feel Socratic learning styles provide the best learning experience. As medical students had just finished a predominantly virtual preclinical year due to the COVID-19 pandemic, our research team was interested in understanding students’ perceptions of virtual and in-person experiential learning activities. The primary goal of this study is to compare medical students’ perceptions of the quality and value of in-person versus virtual experiential learning during their pediatric clerkship. Secondary measures of this study examine the differences regarding the retention of case information presented, the clinical relevance of the pediatric cases discussed, and the likelihood that students will attend similar future sessions. Our team hypothesized that students would perceive in-person sessions as more valuable and meaningful to their medical education. One academic year of medical students who participated in two experiential learning encounters during their pediatric clerkship was assessed. Each encounter involved a series of approximately ten patient cases over two hours; one encounter was done in person, and the other was done virtually. Each case was then discussed using a Socratic format; faculty would ask questions and engage students individually, assessing their decision-making capability (including differential diagnosis, treatment plans, and dispositions). Data was collected by a survey administered after both encounters, each with the same questions. Students generally felt the virtual format for this type of training was as well received as the in-person format (56% vs. 52.2% for excellent value ratings, respectively). Similarly, 43.5% of students reported that the in-person cases greatly improved their retention, while 40% said the virtual cases improved their retention of educational material to the same degree. The in-person experiences were reported as being extremely clinically relevant by 56.5% of students, while the virtual cases were perceived as extremely relevant by 48% of respondents. Lastly, survey data showed that 47.8% of respondents said they would very likely attend similar future in-person sessions (compared to 44% for similar virtual events). Our team feels that the results of this study demonstrate that utilizing a Socratic Model of teaching in experiential learning has excellent value, and high-quality training can be accomplished virtually, even during times of potential virtual fatigue. These findings are important as our results show that experiential learning can be adapted, yet still beneficial, when in-person activities cannot take place, such as what we encountered during the COVID-19 pandemic.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:ETSU/oai:dc.etsu.edu:asrf-2085 |
| Date | 25 April 2023 |
| Creators | Berry, Andrew Mitchell, Blankenship, Stephen Brock, M.D., Gibson, Jennifer, M.D., Wigger, Andrew, Craig, Karilynn |
| Publisher | Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University |
| Source Sets | East Tennessee State University |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Source | Appalachian Student Research Forum |
Page generated in 0.0248 seconds