Wind energy development and its stigma of avian mortality provide a case for
exploring the complexities that can occur between science, law, politics, and planning.
The present method of measuring mortality appears flawed and may hamper the ability of
resource agencies, the public, and industry in making educated decisions about siting
wind farms and protecting species. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has the ability to
take an active role and affect a project already constructed. The Migratory Bird Treaty
Act appears to keep the issue of avian mortality within the minds of wind energy
developers. Protecting species on the brink of extinction is codified in the Endangered
Species Act, which seems to be well suited for protecting most species. The significance
of avian mortality can be linked to public perceptions. The industry in Texas has taken
the approach of not sharing avian-related data, except in very few instances. Providing
such substantial federal incentives through the Production Tax Credit rather than direct
federal funding bypasses the National Environmental Policy Act and its requirement that
federal governments consider impacts to the environment. / text
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UTEXAS/oai:repositories.lib.utexas.edu:2152/22363 |
| Date | 21 November 2013 |
| Creators | Ford, Scott A. |
| Source Sets | University of Texas |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
| Format | electronic |
| Rights | Copyright is held by the author. Presentation of this material on the Libraries' web site by University Libraries, The University of Texas at Austin was made possible under a limited license grant from the author who has retained all copyrights in the works., Restricted |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds