Return to search

The roles of vitamin D in cutaneous wound healing: In vitro and ex vivo studies of the effect of 1,25(OH)2D3 and its precursors on human dermal fibroblasts and epidermal keratinocytes in cutaneous wound healing

In humans, the epidermis is the main site for the synthesis of Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) from 7-dehydrocholesterol. Cholecalciferol undergoes further hydroxylation in the liver and kidney to produce the active form of the circulating hormone 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3). In target cells, 1,25(OH)2D3 interacts with the specific intracellular vitamin D receptor (VDR), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily. However, epidermal keratinocytes, in addition to being target cells, have enzymes required for autocrine production of 1,25(OH)2D3. They can convert cholecalciferol to 1,25(OH)2D3 via 25-hydroxylase (CYP2R1) and 1α-hydroxylase (CYP27B1). Another enzyme, 24-hydroxylase (CYP24A1), regulates local levels by inactivating 1,25(OH)2D3. While recent studies have shown that absence of VDR or 1,25(OH)2D3 impairs formation of granulation tissue during wound healing in mice, little is known about the autocrine and paracrine regulation of biologically active vitamin D3 by human dermal fibroblasts during cutaneous wound healing.
Primary cultures of human keratinocytes and fibroblasts expressed VDR and all the cytochrome enzymes necessary for autocrine production of vitamin D. The relative expression of VDR mRNA was higher in dermal fibroblasts than donor-matched keratinocytes. In contrast, epidermal keratinocytes had a higher mRNA expression of vitamin D3 metabolising enzymes. A scratch wound assay confirmed that 1,25(OH)2D3 stimulated keratinocyte migration, but paradoxically inhibited fibroblast migration as early as 4h, yet neither cholecalciferol nor 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 had any effect. VDR knockdown using small interfering RNA (siRNA) abolished the inhibitory effect of 1,25(OH)2D3 on fibroblast migration, demonstrating the requirement for the VDR in this response.
Immunofluorescent staining revealed that 1,25(OH)2D3 increased nuclear VDR protein expression, without a corresponding increase in VDR mRNA transcription only in mechanically wounded dermal fibroblasts, indicating activation of the receptors. Incubation with either 1,25(OH)2D3, cholecalciferol or 25(OH)D3 up-regulated CYP24A1 transcription. This response was most pronounced with 1,25(OH)2D3, suggesting a tightly regulated feedback control on 1,25(OH)2D3 bioavailability within the dermis. In addition, cholecalciferol also increased CYP2R1 and CYP27B1 mRNA expression in scratched dermal fibroblasts, providing evidence for autocrine regulation of 1,25(OH)2D3 by dermal fibroblasts.
Expression of α-SMA protein was up-regulated in cultured dermal fibroblasts following scratching, which was down-regulated in the presence of 1,25(OH)2D3. These observations suggest that 1,25(OH)2D3 may restrict differentiation of wounded dermal fibroblasts into pro-fibrotic myofibroblasts. 1,25(OH)2D3 also down-regulated MMP-2 secretion and collagen type I to III ratio in scratched dermal fibroblasts. Using a human ex vivo wound healing model, it was demonstrated that 1,25(OH)2D3, but not cholecalciferol, stimulated the rate of wound closure.
In summary, this study has confirmed that human dermal fibroblasts express the transcriptional machinery for autocrine production of 1,25(OH)2D3, and a higher VDR expression suggests they are more responsive than keratinocytes. Changes in CYP and VDR expression in the presence of cholecalciferol, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 or 1,25(OH)2D3 indicate fine-tuning of the bioavailability of vitamin D in the dermis after wounding. Down-regulation of α-SMA, MMP-2 secretion and the collagen type I to III ratio by 1,25(OH)2D3 highlight an important role for 1,25(OH)2D3 in modulating wound healing and the scarring process.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:BRADFORD/oai:bradscholars.brad.ac.uk:10454/17350
Date January 2018
CreatorsTay, Jing Q.
ContributorsThornton, M. Julie, Graham, Anne M
PublisherUniversity of Bradford, University of Bradford, Faculty of Life Sciences
Source SetsBradford Scholars
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis, doctoral, PhD
Rights<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>.

Page generated in 0.0016 seconds