This study was conducted to assess cutout and value differences in Yield Grade 4
beef carcasses by evaluating impacts of gender, fatness, muscling, and weight. USDA
Choice, Yield Grade 4 carcasses (n = 60) were selected according to gender: heifers (n =
20) and steers (n = 40), and weight groups: lightweight heifers (315.5 - 362.9 kg) and
steers (362.9 - 408.2 kg), and heavy weight heifers (362.9 - 408.2 kg) steers (408.2 -
453.6 kg). Within weight classes, carcasses were separated according to ribeye area per
45.36 kg of HCW ratio (REAcm2 :100 kg): heifers (>21.76) and (< or equal to 21.76); steers
(greater than 20.07) and (less than or equal to 20.07) based on analysis from NBQA-2005 (National Beef Quality
Audit - 2005). Data in this study showed that within yield grade 4 carcasses, there are
both conformational and value differences associated with different types of yield grade
4's, particularly when sex-class is considered due to the biological differences associated
with fat and muscle deposition between genders. As expected, carcasses from heifers
had more trimmable fat than steers, and steers had higher yields of certain cuts from the
chuck and in bone differences than did heifers. In this demonstration, applied estimated discounts out-weighted the value differences found in cutout values. There were no
clear associations in carcass traits that could be used to more accurately sort value
differences in Yield Grade 4 carcasses with exception to sex-class. However, the present
data suggests a need to establish a prediction equation that predicts carcass value in
addition to the current Yield Grade equation. In conclusion, further research is needed
incorporating all yield grade carcass types. Standard carcass fabrication styles and fat
trim levels consistent with industry are needed to further assign current subprimal and
minor cut prices. Additional premium and discount prices are needed for a current
industry representation to obtain if premiums and discounts are being applied according
to potential profits or losses incurred because of cutability differences found between the
different yield grades.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:tamu.edu/oai:repository.tamu.edu:1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2009-08-902 |
| Date | 14 January 2010 |
| Creators | Dillon, James T. |
| Contributors | Savell, Jeffrey W. |
| Source Sets | Texas A and M University |
| Language | en_US |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Book, Thesis, Electronic Thesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
Page generated in 0.0037 seconds