The fertilizer production facility had a negative impact on the soil, groundwater and surface water environment due to the handling / storage and production activities at the site. Observations and numerical modelling found the fertilizer product loadings areas as the main source area of contaminants viz. Ca, Mg, NO3, Cl, SO4, EC and TDS. Uncontrolled run-off emanating from the site is a major contributing factor to contaminating the groundwater and surface water resources.
A distinct difference could be observed between the geochemical signature of the potential contaminated seepage and that of the groundwater. This geochemical characterisation of the contaminant plume identified an interaction of the leachate and the soil with a high clay (montmorillonite) content, with various cation exchange and sorption processes occurring. Potassium is largely exchanged (for sodium), while phosphates are likely to sorbed on the clay particles. Nitrate is likely to be retarded to a limited extent, especially when redox conditions are conducive to the conservation of the nitrate specie. The elevated contaminant concentrations pose a health risk to potential users and livestock which may ingest the water, especially nitrate concentrations.
Numerical modelling was used to validate and develop the site conceptual model. Iterative modelling improved the initial correlation R2 of modelled and observed nitrate concentrations, the correlation improved from 0.29 to 0.64. The model was validated by assuming that horizontal and bedding plan fractures are likely to play a role in contaminant transport (which was not modelled). Artificial recharge (seepage and leachate infiltration) was present at the plant area. Groundwater abstraction from farmers boreholes downstream had an influence on the development of the nitrate plume. Surface water contamination contributed to the current plume geometry and therefore partly responsible for the current plume extent. A secondary groundwater contaminant source was found in the south western part of the study area. Predictive modelling found abstraction of groundwater from site to be the most effective containment measure when compared to a cut-off trench. The groundwater contamination is likely to pose a low current and future risk to groundwater users, as no current groundwater users are found in proximity to the site and the contaminant plume. However a potential surface contaminant risk does occur to down stream surface water bodies during a flood event.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:ufs/oai:etd.uovs.ac.za:etd-11162010-105845 |
Date | 16 November 2010 |
Creators | Bredenkamp, Brendon |
Contributors | Prof GJ van Tonder |
Publisher | University of the Free State |
Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
Language | en-uk |
Detected Language | English |
Type | text |
Format | application/pdf |
Source | http://etd.uovs.ac.za//theses/available/etd-11162010-105845/restricted/ |
Rights | unrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to University Free State or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
Page generated in 0.0021 seconds