According to Morling and Evered’s (2006) Fit-Focused model of secondary control, an
individual can adapt to adverse circumstances by accepting the situation and adjusting the self. The present study examined this theory in a competitive achievement setting to determine whether vulnerable students who relinquish academic control (high acceptance/low adjustment
beliefs) benefit from an Attributional Retraining (AR) treatment intervention compared with a Stress Reduction (SR) treatment. Based on an 8-month quasi-experimental treatment study, a priori t-tests were used to test the hypotheses within an Adjustment (low, high) x Treatment (AR, SR) Analyses of Covariance experimental design for individuals high in failure acceptance. Findings revealed that AR (versus SR) facilitated higher long-term learning-related affects and academic performance for relinquished control students. The findings reveal AR’s strategic
utility for assisting vulnerable individuals who lack Fit-Focused SC, as well as provide empirical support for Morling and Evered’s (2006) Fit-Focused model.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:MANITOBA/oai:mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca:1993/24014 |
Date | 10 September 2014 |
Creators | Parker, Patti C. |
Contributors | Perry, Raymond (Psychology), Chipperfield, Judith (Psychology) Clifton, Rodney (Educational Administration, Foundations and Psychology) |
Source Sets | University of Manitoba Canada |
Detected Language | English |
Page generated in 0.0019 seconds