Return to search

Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of migraine: A systematic review and a randomised controlled trial.

Migraine affects 8 -16% of population in different countries resulting in significant economic and social impacts. Current pharmacological treatment provides symptomatic relief, but not without side effects. Hence, an increasing proportion of patients prefer complementary therapies including acupuncture for migraine relief. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture treatment for migraine have produced conflicting evidence due to methodological and reporting deficiencies, including small sample sizes and inappropriate outcome measures. Furthermore, systematic reviews on acupuncture for headache failed to adequately represent non-English studies such as those conducted in China. This project aimed to: (1) systematically review studies of acupuncture for migraine; and (2) conduct a RCT addressing key deficiencies identified from the systematic reviews (SRs). Two SRs were conducted based onfollowing Cochrane review protocols. Major English, Chinese, Japanese and Korean databases were searched. The first SR included 15 English studies and the second SR had 17 Chinese studies. No Japanese or Korean RCTs were identified. Overall, those two SRs supported the value of acupuncture in the treatment and prevention of migraine when compared with western medications. However, conflicting results were found when real acupuncture treatments were compared with sham/placebo procedures. When compared with the studies published in English, Chinese studies had a higher frequency of acupuncture treatment, displayed poor methodological quality, and commonly used pharmacotherapy as a comparator. The SRs revealed that there was limited evaluation of acupuncture for frequent migraine. In the RCT, fifty participants with a minimum of eight migraine days per four weeks were randomly allocated to receive real (RA, n = 26) and sham (SA, n = 24) acupuncture for a total of 16 sessions over 20 weeks in a gradually decreasing treatment frequency. Fixed and supplementary acupoints were used. Participants were followed up for further assessment at three months and one year. Results showed that at the end of the treatment period, the mean (SD) migraine attack days per four weeks decreased from 11.81 (5.76) to 5.17 (5.02) in the RA group and from 12.41 (6.4) to 10.08 (7.11) in SA (group difference: p = .008). Intensity of migraine assessed using a Six-point Likert scale was lower in the RA (2.18 ±1.05) than that in the SA group (2.93 ± 0.61, p = 0.004). The percentile changes of pressure pain threshold (PPTs) detected at the bilateral points of TaiYang (Ex-HN5) were significantly higher in the RA group (RA 228.48% vs. SA -0.66 % on the left and 92.69% vs. -2.52% on the right). However, there was no s tatistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to Migraine Specific Quality of Life (MSQOL). At the end of the three-month follow up, medication consumption was less in the RA group, but not at the one-year follow up. In conclusion, this project demonstrates that acupuncture is a potentially effective and safe option for adult patients with frequent migraine headache with the effects lasting up to three months. Further studies are needed to confirm these therapeutic benefits with adequate sample sizes and the potential mechanism for this action.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:ADTP/247934
Date January 2008
CreatorsWang, Yanyi, s3042947@student.rmit.edu.au
PublisherRMIT University. Health Science
Source SetsAustraliasian Digital Theses Program
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Rightshttp://www.rmit.edu.au/help/disclaimer, Copyright Yanyi Wang

Page generated in 0.0021 seconds