This thesis will focus on the changes that modernization, especially during the transition
period from communism to capitalism, brought to the use of the terms “domn” (sir) and
“doamna” (lady) in Romania. The main question of the research will be whether these terms are
still used and if they are used with the same meaning as they were before: in short, what does it
mean to be ‘lady” or “sir” in modern Romania? The thesis will try to examine the way modern
life lessened the differences between country side/rural life and town/urban life and between
people with different educational levels. In Romania little research has been done examining
how modernization affects everyday life and how individuals view and understand the world.
Modernization is a key word in almost every field in Romania today, but the human dimension
especially that of everyday life has not received much attention. The thesis will try to give a
perspective on how the recent social transformations have changed the way people view
themselves and the opportunities that developed as a result. Romania is an East European country in transition. This means that among other things
that for Romanians things seem to change rapidly and sometimes abruptly in very short time,
often without much sense or logic. The result is that Romanians have had to learn how to adapt
very quickly and to learn new social and material skills almost every day. Romania and her
passage from socialism to capitalism can be a laboratory for anthropological research on some of
the disciplines central and emerging themes. Among these is how the elite is self constructed and
self selected over time. Another is the role that shifts in elites can play in a country’s and a
culture’s economic and cultural transitions. This research will also add to the literature on
Romania because while elite’s effects, both positive and negative have received much media
attention, the scholarly literature is almost silent in how elites are defined and emerged since
1989. The study of the elites will also bring a better understanding of the way people in
Romania behave, understand and accept each other. It will also help us to understand their goals
and how these got defined in this transition period in Romania’s history. Looking at how
Romanians think about (categorize) each other will also help the rest of the world understand
Romanian culture and society. This is important - especially for those inside and outside the
country who have a stake in Romania’s future. / Romania, past and present : a historical and social background of status in Romania -- Status in Romania 2011 : fieldwork results -- Ideas over how status is perceived in present Romania. / Department of Anthropology
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:BSU/oai:cardinalscholar.bsu.edu:123456789/198111 |
| Date | 03 May 2014 |
| Creators | Beteringhe, Alina Magdalena |
| Contributors | Nyce, James M. |
| Source Sets | Ball State University |
| Detected Language | English |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds