Most existing data mining approaches perform data mining tasks on a single data table. However, increasingly, data repositories such as financial data and medical records, amongst others, are stored in relational databases. The inability of applying traditional data mining techniques directly on such relational database thus poses a serious challenge. To address this issue, a number of researchers convert a relational database into one or more flat files and then apply traditional data mining algorithms. The above-mentioned process of transforming a relational database into one or more flat files usually involves aggregation. Aggregation functions such as maximum, minimum, average, standard deviation, count and sum are commonly used in such a flattening process.
Our research aims to address the following question: Is there a link between aggregation and possible privacy violations during relational database mining? In this research we investigate how, and if, applying aggregation functions will affect the privacy of a relational database, during supervised learning, or classification, where the target concept is known. To this end, we introduce the PBIRD (Privacy Breach Investigation in Relational Databases) methodology. The PBIRD methodology combines multi-view learning with feature selection, to discover the potentially dangerous sets of features as hidden within a database. Our approach creates a number of views, which consist of subsets of the data, with and without aggregation. Then, by identifying and investigating the set of selected features in each view, potential privacy breaches are detected. In this way, our PBIRD algorithm is able to discover those features that are correlated with the classification target that may also lead to revealing of sensitive information in the database.
Our experimental results show that aggregation functions do, indeed, change the correlation between attributes and the classification target. We show that with aggregation, we obtain a set of features which can be accurately linked to the classification target and used to predict (with high accuracy) the confidential information. On the other hand, the results show that, without aggregation we obtain another different set of potentially harmful features. By identifying the complete set of potentially dangerous attributes, the PBIRD methodology provides a solution where the database designers/owners can be warned, to subsequently perform necessary adjustments to protect the privacy of the relational database.
In our research, we also perform a comparative study to investigate the impact of aggregation on the classification accuracy and on the time required to build the models. Our results suggest that in the case where a database consists only of categorical data, aggregation should especially be used with caution. This is due to the fact that aggregation causes a decrease in overall accuracies of the resulting models. When the database contains mixed attributes, the results show that the accuracies without aggregation and with aggregation are comparable. However, even in such scenarios, schemas without aggregation tend to slightly outperform. With regard to the impact of aggregation on the model building time, the results show that, in general, the models constructed with aggregation require shorter building time. However, when the database is small and consists of nominal attributes with high cardinality, aggregation causes a slower model building time.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:uottawa.ca/oai:ruor.uottawa.ca:10393/22695 |
| Date | January 2012 |
| Creators | Jafer, Yasser |
| Contributors | Viktor, Herna, Paquet, Eric |
| Publisher | Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa |
| Source Sets | Université d’Ottawa |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0021 seconds