Return to search

Correspondence between Multiple-Respondent Anecdotal Assessments and Functional Analysis: Analyses of Rank-Order, Magnitude-of-Difference, and Overall Outcomes

We administered the Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS) and the Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF) to five raters and compared the results with functional analysis outcomes for 12 cases in which agreement was obtained for at least four out of five raters on either anecdotal assessment. The scores for functional categories on the MAS and QABF were ranked by averaging the scores for the raters who agreed on the primary maintaining variable. Functional analysis results were ranked by examining average responding across all conditions. A comparison showed correspondence between the highest category and the highest functional analysis condition for 10 out of 11 cases for the MAS and all 10 cases for the QABF. Correspondence for the category and condition ranked second was found for 2 out of 11 cases for the MAS and 2 out of 10 cases for the QABF. The magnitude of difference between categories on the MAS/QABF did not appear to predict the amount of difference in responding in the corresponding functional analyses.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:unt.edu/info:ark/67531/metadc849776
Date05 1900
CreatorsArnalds, Holmfridur Osk
ContributorsSmith, Richard G. (Richard Gordon), 1956-, Ingvarsson, Einar Thor, Toussaint, Karen A.
PublisherUniversity of North Texas
Source SetsUniversity of North Texas
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis or Dissertation
Formatvii, 78 pages : illustrations, Text
RightsPublic, Arnalds, Holmfridur Osk, Copyright, Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights Reserved.

Page generated in 0.0017 seconds