Return to search

Structure-function studies of peptide fragments derived from a defensin of the tick Ornithodoros savignyi Audouin (1827)

Overuse of conventional antibiotics has led to increased multidrug resistant micro-organisms. Therefore, development of alternative drugs with new mechanisms of action in the control of resistant micro-organisms is urgently needed. Defensins, one of the larger groups of naturally occurring antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), found in a variety of species, may serve as templates for the development of novel therapeutic agents. The work completed in this study is based on an antimicrobial peptide (AMP), Os, derived from the C-terminus of a tick Ornithodoros savignyi defensin isoform 2 (OsDef2). OsDef2 was found to be active against Gram-positive bacteria only, whereas Os, showed bactericidal activity towards both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. In this study a series of synthetic shorter peptides, based on the sequence of Os, was utilised in order to determine whether shorter peptides would retain their antibacterial activity and selectivity. Initial screening indicated that only two fragments, Os(3-12) and Os(11-22), were active towards the tested Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. The minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of the two fragments were determined and ranged from 30 μg/ml to 120 μg/ml. The MBCs of the parent peptide, Os (1.88 to 15 μg/ml), was considerably lower than that of Os(3-12) and Os(11-22). As previously observed for Os, neither of the peptides showed cytotoxic effects towards eukaryotic cells. The amidated analogue of one of the active peptides, Os(11-22)NH2, was further evaluated in terms of its secondary structure, antibacterial and antioxidant activities as well as cytotoxicity. Amidation increased the activity of Os(11-22) 16 fold towards B. subtilis (MBC of 1.88 μg/ml) and 32 fold towards both Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MBC of 3.75 μg/ml), whereas a 2 fold decrease in activity was observed against Staphylococcus aureus (MBC of 60 μg/ml). Circular dichroism data showed that amidation altered the secondary structure of Os(11-22) from α-helical to mostly random coiled. In the presence of 30% serum the activity of Os(11-22)NH2 unexpectedly increased 8 fold against S. aureus (MBC of 7.5 μg/ml), but decreased 32 fold against E. coli (MBC of 120 μg/ml). The activity of Os(11-22)NH2 in 100 mM NaCl decreased 4 fold against E. coli (MBC of 15 μg/ml), but was completely lost (MBC >120 μg/ml) against S. aureus. The kinetics of bactericidal activity indicated that Os(11-22)NH2 killed B. subtilis and E. coli within 30 min and 120 min, respectively, whereas Os killed both bacteria within 5 min. Even at high concentrations Os(Os(11-22)NH2 was non-toxic towards human erythrocytes and SC-1 cells, moreover an increase in SC-1 cell number was observed at 120 μg/ml. The peptide showed strong antioxidant activity and was found to be 4 fold more active than glutathione (GSH), however Os was 3.4 fold more antioxidative than Os(11-22)NH2. Os(11-22)NH2 can be considered a dual functional peptide, since it possesses both antibacterial and antioxidant activity. The amidated peptide has the potential for use against the damaging effects of oxidative stress associated with infectious diseases and recovery of chronic wounds. Further investigation into structure-function properties of Os(11-22)NH2 is necessary. / Dissertation (MSc)--University of Pretoria, 2013. / gm2014 / Biochemistry / Unrestricted

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:up/oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/41020
Date January 2013
CreatorsOdendaal, Clerisa
ContributorsGaspar, A.R.M. (Anabella Regina Marques), clerisa.o@gmail.com, Neitz, A.W.H. (Albert Walter Herman)
PublisherUniversity of Pretoria
Source SetsSouth African National ETD Portal
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeDissertation
Rights© 2013 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.

Page generated in 0.0023 seconds