The theses includes an analysis of the institute of setting aside an arbitral award by court. It is focused on summary of present theoretical findings which are drawn mainly from commentary literature. However, the key focus of the theses is an analysis of relevant judicial decisions related to the investigated institute. It uses decisions of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic and the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic in particular. The theses is divided into introduction, four parts and conclusion. The first part contains a brief explanation of historical development of setting aside an arbitral award. Then it is focused on theoretical doctrines and judicial decisions related to the nature of arbitration and arbitral award and on the role of the courts in arbitration. The following part deals with the setting aside an arbitral award as a civil proceeding. It focuses on material juristiction of courts to the proceeding and possibility of setting aside a resolution issued by arbitrator as both of these matters are new to the proceeding. The fundamental part of the theses is the analysis of the various reasons for setting aside an arbitral award. All seven reasons are covered in the order in which they appear in the law. Priority is given to the reasons consisting in lack of...
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:411465 |
Date | January 2020 |
Creators | Sýkora, Vít |
Contributors | Pohl, Tomáš, Macková, Alena |
Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
Language | Czech |
Detected Language | English |
Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0019 seconds