IAbstractThrough an analysis of the practices surrounding Qiqushan Temple, this article discussesthe different focus of public and official spacial practice. The materials used in thispaper include the recollections of the interviewees of their practical experiences, popularreviews of the temple on travel software, and relevant official documents. The aim of thispaper is to discuss why religious practices are more invisible than heritage practices inboth popular and official practices surrounding the Qiqushan Temple. The material usedin this paper includes the recollections of the interviewees of their practical experiences,popular reviews of the temple on travel software, and relevant official documents. Inpublic practice, Qiqushan Temple is a functional religious space that satisfies the public’simagination of God. In official practice, it is a constructive space that serves the unifiedconstruction of the country. The structure of explicit and implicit is used to summarizethe more prominent position of heritage practice than religious practice. Officials placegreater emphasis on heritage practices, as religion is rarely considered in modern China’sdesign of the modernization process.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:uu-486886 |
| Date | January 2022 |
| Creators | Zeng, Yiqi |
| Publisher | Uppsala universitet, Konstvetenskapliga institutionen |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds