The empirical likelihood method introduced by Owen (1988, 1990) is a powerful
nonparametric method for statistical inference. It has been one of the most researched
methods in statistics in the last twenty-five years and remains to be a very active
area of research today. There is now a large body of literature on empirical likelihood
method which covers its applications in many areas of statistics (Owen, 2001).
One important problem affecting the empirical likelihood method is its poor accuracy,
especially for small sample and/or high-dimension applications. The poor
accuracy can be alleviated by using high-order empirical likelihood methods such as
the Bartlett corrected empirical likelihood but it cannot be completely resolved by
high-order asymptotic methods alone. Since the work of Tsao (2004), the impact of
the convex hull constraint in the formulation of the empirical likelihood on the finite sample
accuracy has been better understood, and methods have been developed to
break this constraint in order to improve the accuracy. Three important methods
along this direction are [1] the penalized empirical likelihood of Bartolucci (2007)
and Lahiri and Mukhopadhyay (2012), [2] the adjusted empirical likelihood by Chen,
Variyath and Abraham (2008), Emerson and Owen (2009), Liu and Chen (2010) and
Chen and Huang (2012), and [3] the extended empirical likelihood of Tsao (2013) and
Tsao and Wu (2013). The latter is particularly attractive in that it retains not only
the asymptotic properties of the original empirical likelihood, but also its important
geometric characteristics. In this thesis, we generalize the extended empirical likelihood
of Tsao and Wu (2013) to handle inferences in two large classes of one-sample
and two-sample problems.
In Chapter 2, we generalize the extended empirical likelihood to handle inference
for the large class of parameters defined by one-sample estimating equations, which
includes the mean as a special case. In Chapters 3 and 4, we generalize the extended
empirical likelihood to handle two-sample problems; in Chapter 3, we study the extended
empirical likelihood for the difference between two p-dimensional means; in
Chapter 4, we consider the extended empirical likelihood for the difference between
two p-dimensional parameters defined by estimating equations. In all cases, we give
both the first- and second-order extended empirical likelihood methods and compare
these methods with existing methods. Technically, the two-sample mean problem
in Chapter 3 is a special case of the general two-sample problem in Chapter 4. We
single out the mean case to form Chapter 3 not only because it is a standalone published
work, but also because it naturally leads up to the more difficult two-sample
estimating equations problem in Chapter 4. We note that Chapter 2 is the published paper Tsao and Wu (2014); Chapter 3 is
the published paper Wu and Tsao (2014). To comply with the University of Victoria
policy regarding the use of published work for thesis and in accordance with copyright
agreements between authors and journal publishers, details of these published work
are acknowledged at the beginning of these chapters. Chapter 4 is another joint paper
Tsao and Wu (2015) which has been submitted for publication. / Graduate / 0463 / fwu@uvic.ca
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:uvic.ca/oai:dspace.library.uvic.ca:1828/6124 |
| Date | 04 May 2015 |
| Creators | Wu, Fan |
| Contributors | Tsao, Min |
| Source Sets | University of Victoria |
| Language | English, English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
| Rights | Available to the World Wide Web |
Page generated in 0.0023 seconds