Regardless of genre, Shakespeare’s plays open in many different ways on the stage. Some openings come in the form of a prologue and extend from it; others in the form of a framing dialogue; some may begin in medias res; and there is also a single case of an induction in The Taming of the Shrew. My dissertation, “Shakespeare’s Openings in
Action: A Study of Four Plays from the Period 1591- c.1602,” subsequently referred to as “Shakespeare’s Openings in Action,” attempts to define the construction of openings in the context of Shakespeare’s dramaturgy and to understand texts which were written in the first place to be performed on a platform stage by actors experienced in theatrical practice. By analysing the playwright’s organization of the dramatic material, as reflected
in the play-texts, I attempt to gauge how an opening set out to engage original audiences
in the play, an essential function of theatrical composition, and to determine to what extent the play-text may be considered as an extended stage direction for early modern actors.1
What is the present state of scholarship in the subject?
Although sparse, critical interest in the openings of Shakespeare’s plays can be
found as early as 1935 in the work of A. C. Sprague, Shakespeare and the Audience. In
more recent years, other studies have appeared, for instance, Robert F. Willson, Jr., Shakespeare’s Opening Scenes (1977), and a number of articles included in Entering
the Maze: Shakespeare’s Art of Beginning, edited by F. Willson Jr. (1995).
Existing scholarship provides a good general framework for further research into
the openings of Shakespeare’s plays. In addition to the studies presented above, I
shall draw on analytical approaches to play-text analysis which involve theatre
practice, for example in the work of André Helbo, Approaching Theatre (1991), Anne
Ubersfeld, Reading Theatre (1996), and John Russell Brown, Shakespeare’s Plays in
Performance (1993); John Barton, Playing Shakespeare (1984), and Cicely Berry,
Text in Action. London (2001). These works provide revealing insights into the
theatrical possibilities of dramatic language and actor technique.
1The analytical method presented in this dissertation supplements studies made of the complex textual
histories of Shakespeare’s plays by considering the staging and characterisation information they contain.
In the case of multiple-text plays, it takes account of editorial scholarship and explains the reasons for
choosing to analyse the material contained in one version over the other(s).
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:LACETR/oai:collectionscanada.gc.ca:OTU.1807/33845 |
| Date | 06 December 2012 |
| Creators | Benabu, Joel M. |
| Contributors | Levenson, Jill L. |
| Source Sets | Library and Archives Canada ETDs Repository / Centre d'archives des thèses électroniques de Bibliothèque et Archives Canada |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds