Charter schools have often boasted about differentiating themselves in the educational
marketplace. With today’s growing emphasis on student achievement, whether this
differentiation has had a positive effect on student learning is still debatable. The purpose
of this exploratory mixed-methods study was to establish if innovation is a reported
practice in charter schools in Miami-Dade and Sarasota Counties in Florida and to
determine if a relationship exists between innovation reporting and student achievement
as measured by Florida school grades. A qualitative analysis of School Improvement
Plans and school websites for a 62 school sample was utilized. As well as a quantitative
measure of the correlation between level of reported innovation in eight categories
(organizational structure, ideology and culture, leadership models, professional
development for teachers, curriculum, technology, parent involvement, and other) and
student achievement, as measured by Florida’s school grade formula. The study found
that charter schools in both counties reported innovation at high levels with only three schools reporting innovations in fewer than five categories of innovation. An examination
of opposing forces of loose and rigid structure, autonomy and policy control, as well as
creativity and standardization led to findings of less reported instances of innovation on
average in schools with looser structure, autonomy, and creativity. Furthermore, Title I
schools and high minority student population schools (≥50%) showed signs of innovation
saturation, with no value added to student achievement (school grade averages) by
reported innovation beyond a moderate level. Still, reported innovation level (overall
categories of innovation) and student achievement (school grade averages) showed a
negligible relationship (r = -.062). In conclusion, reported innovation existed in charter
schools despite opposing forces, but was often similar across charter schools. In fact,
past a moderate level of innovation, there was no value added to school grades for Title I
and high minority charter schools. Yet, a weak, negative relationship existed between
specific reported innovations in combination (professional development in pedagogy,
tutoring programs, non-district behavior programs and incentive, and multiple levels) and
student achievement (school grade averages) which can inform us on the nature of
reporting. / Includes bibliography. / Dissertation (Ph.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2016. / FAU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Collection
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:fau.edu/oai:fau.digital.flvc.org:fau_33745 |
| Contributors | Cabrera, Einav (author), Maslin-Ostrowski, Patricia (Thesis advisor), Florida Atlantic University (Degree grantor), College of Education, Department of Educational Leadership and Research Methodology |
| Publisher | Florida Atlantic University |
| Source Sets | Florida Atlantic University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, Text |
| Format | 166 p., application/pdf |
| Rights | Copyright © is held by the author, with permission granted to Florida Atlantic University to digitize, archive and distribute this item for non-profit research and educational purposes. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires permission of the copyright holder., http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds